- Do justices not foresee consequences?
- Heather Cox Richardson on the big beautiful bill;
- How JD Vance reveals the administration’s true motivations; cruelty is the thing;
- Jonathan Chait on Republicans’ “incomprehensibly reckless plan”;
- Robert Reich on conservatives’ animosity to empathy (never mind Jesus Christ);
- Initial thoughts about Springsteen’s “Western Stars”.
Sometimes you wonder if lawyers, judges, and justices are so focused on the validity of a particular law that they don’t consider the implications of their ruling. Obsessed with the technical details and missing the big picture.

Slate, Heidi Feldman, 30 Jun 2025: Supreme Court Rules Some Americans Have a Constitutional Right to Insist on Theocracy











