Timothy Ferris, COMING OF AGE IN THE MILKY WAY

(Morrow, 1988, 495pp, including 107pp of appendices (a glossary and a timeline history of the universe), notes, bibliography, and index)

This is the first big substantial nonfiction book I’ve read in a while, especially one specifically about science. Ferris is a science writer who began with THE RED LIMIT (1977) which I read years ago, a couple coffee table books of astronomical photos, GALAXIES and SPACE SHOTS, in the early 1980s, before this book in 1988. And I have three of his later books that also look substantial, and that I’ll get to eventually.

This book speaks to one of my key interests: how humanity came to understand how big, and how old, the universe is. The ancients (like those who wrote the holy books) knew a world only as big as the far horizon, and as old as their oldest stories. I’m already familiar with many of the steps between then and now, through accounts in any number of books about basic science, but here the whole story, along axes of space, time, and creation, is summarized, with a particular emphasis on both the techniques that revealed humanity’s increased understanding of the real world and on the individuals who made these discoveries. There’s much more about the personalities of famous names from history here than in those other books.

And I particularly appreciate the theme represented by the title. Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Book Notes, Cosmology, Science | Comments Off on Timothy Ferris, COMING OF AGE IN THE MILKY WAY

Three Perspectives on Trump’s First 100 Days

  • NY Times summarizes Trump’s first 100 days;
  • The Atlantic on how Trump voters like what they see;
  • My comments about the theme of Tom Nichols’ books — people are bored with success — and the implications this has for the science-fictional dreams of utopia;
  • Two items about Trump supporters;
  • And how Trump *really* believes that doctored photo about MS-13; how Trump, like Kim Jong-Il, has his cabinet praise Glorious Leader; and how Pam Bondi claims that fentanyl busts have save 119, or is it 258?, million American lives.
  • How Trump took credit for the good economy under Biden, and blames the bad economy under his administration on Biden.
– – –

Today is one of those occasions when seeing the front page of the actual print paper is much more dramatic than seeing the same content, spread out over several days, on a website.

Click for larger image.

Continue reading

Posted in Human Nature, Politics, science fiction | Comments Off on Three Perspectives on Trump’s First 100 Days

Edward O. Wilson: LETTERS TO A YOUNG SCIENTIST

(Liveright, 2013, 244pp, including 4pp of acknowledgements and photo credits)

This is one of Wilson’s later, perhaps lesser books, compared to his earlier tomes like ON HUMAN NATURE and CONSILIENCE. It’s more like THE ORIGINS OF CREATIVITY and GENESIS (both reviewed on this blog): a little meandering, repeating points he’s made elsewhere, and semi-autobiographical. Those are not problems if you haven’t read many of his books; there is still enough wisdom in this book to make it worth reading.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Science | Comments Off on Edward O. Wilson: LETTERS TO A YOUNG SCIENTIST

Trump 100

  • Trump’s 100 days, with charts;
  • Even the conservative Wall Street Journal considers Trump’s a “failed presidency”;
  • Now the administration is looking to jail journalists;
  • How MAGA loves public meltdowns;
  • How Hegseth boasts of axing a program as “woke” that was created during Trump’s first administration;
  • And how Trump believes taxing billionaires would hurt poor people’s feelings;
  • And my recollection of the reason poor people don’t want to tax the rich — because they secretly hope they too will become rich one day.
– – –

Many such pieces today.

Washington Post, 29 Apr 2025: Trump’s first 100 days, in 10 charts, subtitled “Executive orders are up, while the S&P 500 and Trump’s approval rating are down.”
Continue reading

Posted in authoritarianism, conservatives, Politics | Comments Off on Trump 100

Chris Mooney, THE REPUBLICAN WAR ON SCIENCE

(Basic Books, 2005, 342pp, including 86pp of interview credits, other credits, notes, and index.)

This is journalist Mooney’s first book, from 20 years ago, and it’s especially apropos to look back at now given the hostility to and/or misunderstanding of science by the current administration. Back in 2015 — 10 years ago! — I read the author’s 2012 book, THE REPUBLICAN BRAIN, and reviewed it here. Very broadly, this first book documents the extent Republicans were hostile to science, from the 1960s through the early 2000s, while the second book sought to understand why. (And that entailed how variations in human personality traits have lead to different takes on the world, especially in a present society that is so different than the ancestral environment where our minds evolved.)

Gist

The 10,000 foot view: Republicans’ increased hostility toward science came, beginning in the late 1950s, from its incursions into religious and business interests. Thus the antipathy toward regulations. (In parallel, not discussed in the book, is the right’s antipathy toward civil rights and the 1960s “counter-culture.”)
Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, conservatives, Science | Comments Off on Chris Mooney, THE REPUBLICAN WAR ON SCIENCE

Who’s Happiest and Why?

  • Phil Zuckerman on that World Happiness Report;
  • A NYT article about alternatives to religion;
  • Recalling mythos and logos;
  • Richard Dawkins on how reality is so much more interesting than religion,
  • And Vox on social trends that may affect religious affiliations.
– – –

I’ve seen cautionary notes about this World Happiness Report on the grounds that the results are self-reported and based on only a single question (how happy are you?) on a scale of 1 to 10. At the same time, the report (at the link) seems exhaustive, in that the results are correlated with variables about GDP per capita, healthy life expectancy, social support, freedom, generosity, and the absence of corruption. And there do seem to be strong correlations between happiness and lack of religious belief.

Continue reading

Posted in Human Nature, Religion, Science | Comments Off on Who’s Happiest and Why?

Tribal Warpaint

  • How Trump doesn’t want to govern, and rejects the idea of American government as a collaboration;
  • How the idea of consumer choice led to the idea of being gay;
  • Trump and covid.gov rewrite the history, as authoritarians do;
  • How Trump has severed America from the world in 100 days;
  • Another item about JFK Jr.’s upside-down understanding of science;
  • Guardian’s Simon Tisdall on how Trump will destroy himself;
  • How MAGA Glam is, it seems to me, tribal warpaint;
  • And how MAGA supporters claim divine intervention to save Trump from assassination;
  • And my take on such claims, and the idea of a father-figure god.
– – –

No doubt there’s a hierarchy of systems of government, that fairly obviously would align with the political spectrum in the US, with (as it seems) MAGA Republicans on one end, and Democracy at the other. For example.

NY Times, Jamelle Bouie, 26 Apr 2025: Trump Doesn’t Want to Govern
Continue reading

Posted in authoritarianism, Culture, History, Lunacy, Politics, Religion, Science | Comments Off on Tribal Warpaint

History Rhymes? Will Humanity Ever Advance?

  • How history rhymes, about tariffs: Smoot-Hawley and Trump;
  • How Musk lives fantasies about expanding the population (of people like him) without a grasp on numbers;
  • How DOGE has cost taxpayers $135B, while claiming to have saved $160B — even that is far less than its goal.
– – –

The experts understand, and the science fiction writers imagine, realms beyond the conception of the vast majority of ordinary people. Science fiction, I think, is about speculating what lies beyond the most abstruse things the experts understand. That’s a core theme here. Will humanity ever advance? Or are we forever mired in primitive thinking?

LA Times, Veronique de Rugy, 24 Apr 2025: Economic nostalgia woos voters, but it leads to terrible policies
Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Politics | Comments Off on History Rhymes? Will Humanity Ever Advance?

The Cowboy Myth, Presidential Corruption, and Disingenuous Cuts to Science Research

  • Heather Cox Richard on the “cowboy myth” that informs the Trump presidency;
  • How Trump et al are giving billionaires a bad name;
  • How Trump has done the most corrupt thing any president has ever done — getting rich from anonymous investors — and how barely anyone cares;
  • How the administration’s cuts to science research echo the disingenuous schemes of the tobacco industry and the fossil-fuel companies.
– – –

 

Heather Cox Richardson: April 24, 2025

She writes about Trump and his scandalous administration, beginning with his “Vladimir, STOP!” entreaty on social media yesterday morning. But I’m noting this for her summary of the “cowboy myth” that still permeates some sectors of American political and cultural thought. I noted this in my summary of her book (beginning here).
Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Lunacy, Politics, Science | Comments Off on The Cowboy Myth, Presidential Corruption, and Disingenuous Cuts to Science Research

Conservative Intellectuals, and the Wrong Way to Do Science

  • Robert Reich collects comments from conservative intellectuals about the Trump administration;
  • Reich summarizes ten points that demonstrates Trump’s ineptitude and incompetence;
  • Similarly, Salon’s Brian Karem on how Trump has turned the White House into a joke;
  • How RFK Jr.’s approach is the opposite of how actual science works;
– – –

So of course there are *some* conservative intellectuals. Even if they’re to the ‘left’ of the MAGA base, if only because they think things through (rather than react simplistically) and they’re not driven by raw tribal hatred of The Other.

Robert Reich, 22 Apr 2025: The view from the right, subtitled “Conservative condemnation of the Trump regime is almost as vehement as is progressive condemnation. Will they give cover to business leaders who have so far remained silent?”
Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Lunacy, Science | Comments Off on Conservative Intellectuals, and the Wrong Way to Do Science