Bertrand Russell, THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY

This is the third of three short books about philosophy that I read in January. It’s as unlike the other two as those two were unlike each other.

(Oxford University Press, 167pp, first published 1912, paperback edition 1959, edition shown 47th printing)

Bertrand Russell, lived a long life, from 1872 to 1970, and so worked mostly in the 20th century. He has always struck me as the first truly modern philosopher, partly because he was not trying to justify any religious background or upbringing, as so many of the earlier philosophers did, and in part because he addressed the entirety of previous philosophy in his enormous book A History of Western Philosophy, published in 1946. He seemed to me as the essence of a rational thinker who didn’t presume to just make stuff up, as so many previous philosophers did. At the same time he speculated on many things that modern science has provided decisive insights into.

Also, he was a public intellectual in the sense that he wrote articles, and books, on numerous political, cultural, and moral issues. I first encountered him with his 1927 book Why I Am Not a Christian, which I first read back in 1979, and revisited its title essay in 2017 in this post.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Philosophy, science fiction | Comments Off on Bertrand Russell, THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY

Stalwarts? Traditionalists? Tribalists? Cultists? Some Evidence

First, I’d thought to post a summary review of the third short philosophy book I’ve read recently — Bertrand Russell’s THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY — but as the day turned out, I had time only to do another round-up of articles I’ve linked the past few days (which takes less time than a book review/profile). Will try to do Russell tomorrow. Of course, these links are all about philosophy in a sense…

  • A Catholic representative considers the nonreligious a “social liability”;
  • How Fearless Leader disregards the truth;
  • Short items: A Fox host defends the strong economy; how Trump staged a fake rally;
  • How Fox News wants Taylor Swift to shut up, while welcoming any number of other celebrities who support conservatives;
  • Red states targeting librarians;
  • How the GOP misrepresents the border bill;
  • WaPo on how the Republicans will never get another border security deal this good;
  • Adam Lee on Houston punishing those who feed the homeless;
  • Paul Krugman defends the idea that “immigrants make America stronger and richer”.

Stalwarts? Traditionalists? Tribalists? Cultists? Let’s look at some evidence. From just the past couple days.

Joe.My.God, 3 Feb 2024: Catholic League: The Unreligious Are A “Social Liability”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Economics, Philosophy, Politics | Comments Off on Stalwarts? Traditionalists? Tribalists? Cultists? Some Evidence

Stalwarts and Progressives: Notes from the (Fringe)

  • Reconsidering how to characterize what I’ve been calling the “fringe”;
  • Taylor Swift and MAGA;
  • Bobby Azarian on why Trump’s supporters don’t believe evidence;
  • Applying the Jack Smith rule to statements from the National Prayer Breakfast.

Here’s the thing: I shouldn’t be referring to the “fringe” as if the people I’ve described being there are outliers. Their sheer numbers indicate they are not outliers, though they are likely still in the minority. (Trump never won a majority of the vote.) What’s changed in the past decade or two isn’t that the number of ignorant, irresponsible, amoral people has ballooned; it’s that we’re hearing more about them, via social media, and see their exacerbating effect on public consciousness and politics.

Still, there should be a term to differentiate the kind of people who vote for Trump, the kind of people who reject modern science and morality (not necessarily the same of course), the racists and misogynists, the believers in woo, and so on, from the relatively more sophisticated, worldly people, including the philosophers and scientists and engineers who have built our modern world, and the artists including musicians and writers and painters who try to honestly interpret our modern world.

Tribalists versus free-thinkers? Maybe… Or maybe not, since those are accurate yet loaded terms. Be nicer and call them Traditionalists? (Of course that implies that progressives disavow tradition, which is hardly the case.) Whatever the first group might be called, here are several items about them today. As I’ve said, I’m fascinated by them not to rag on Republicans or conservatives, but in genuine curiosity about the limitations of human intelligence, and thus the potential of the human race. (In my standard science fiction perspective.) (I noted a few days ago a distinction on some TV show between “stalwarts” and progressives; that word stalwart has a nice flavor to connote the dedication of conservatives to what they feel are immutable truths. Though it has an unfortunate historical connotation…)

NY Times, David French, 4 Feb 2024: Taylor Swift and the Profound Weirdness of MAGA

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Lunacy, Religion | Comments Off on Stalwarts and Progressives: Notes from the (Fringe)

Three brief (non-political) items today.

  • On entertaining new ideas;
  • Reality and quantum mechanics;
  • Nature as the great recycler.

Here’s the first post in a new column that sounds interesting.

Washington Post, Daniel Pink, 29 Jan 2024: Opinion | American imagination needs an adrenaline shot. Here’s how I’ll deliver it.

Continue reading

Posted in Cosmology, Science, Thinking | Comments Off on Three brief (non-political) items today.

The US Civil War, the Terrible Economy, and the Rule of Christians

  • Chinese propaganda says the US is in a civil war;
  • How conservative propaganda ignores or blocks the good news about the economy;
  • How MAGA is right about Trump changing American politics;
  • The current facts about the economy, from WaPo and Paul Krugman;
  • MAGA notes: still using debunked climate data; open to throwing migrants out of helicopters; how MAGA is driven by white racism; Nikki Haley against another black president; conservatives at war with education; some states would send trans teens to prison; Oregon lawmaker says non-Christians are unfit for public office; Mike Johnson’s ties with Christian fundamentalists who support slavery.

Here’s an item to keep things in perspective.

BBC, 2 Feb 2024: Misinformation spreads in China on ‘civil war’ in Texas

Amid the escalating border standoff between Texas and the White House over illegal immigration, misinformation has spread in China that the Lone Star state has officially declared war to secede from the US.

[ … ]

While foreign media is largely blocked in China, content from foreign media is often cherry-picked to stoke suggestions of US internal divisions.

Sounds just like Fox News!

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on The US Civil War, the Terrible Economy, and the Rule of Christians

Will Durant, THE GREATEST MINDS AND IDEAS OF ALL TIME

I’ve read three short books about philosophy recently; this is the second. Each is quite different from the others. If the first book (review here) was an overview focusing on the big questions that philosophy asks – What should we do? What is there? and How do we know? – this second one is a philosophy fan-boy’s collection of top ten lists. So if the interest is, who are the top 10 philosophers of all time, this is the place to come.

Simon & Schuster, 2002. Compiled and edited by John Little. 127pp including index.

Durant was in fact a well known historian and public intellectual, for decades throughout the 20th century. He was the author, along with his wife, of an 11-volume work called THE STORY OF CIVILIZATION, published over many years, from 1935 to 1975, with a final volume unfinished at the time of his death in 1981, at the age of 96. (As I recall the Durants lived in Santa Monica, or adjacent Brentwood, and Will’s passing was a big deal in local news at that time. In part because there was discussion of what would happen to his enormous collection of books. If I recall correctly, the honors went to Dutton’s, a once-famous, by now long-closed, bookstore on San Vincente Blvd.)

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, History, Philosophy | Comments Off on Will Durant, THE GREATEST MINDS AND IDEAS OF ALL TIME

Another Orion Photo

Plus:

  • The wackadoodle conspiracy theory about Taylor Swift and the Super Bowl;
  • Items about why Trump is blocking the border deal; how Trump would destroy the American-led world order; why Republicans are killing the border deal; and a handy guide for Republicans commenting on mass shootings;
  • From the fringe: banning sexting; how a GOP lawmaker thinks all gays are pedophiles;
  • Finally: I’ve disabled comments. I only get spam.

This one is even better than the one I posted on 16 Jan 2024, since this shows the constellation in perspective of a ground view. Again, those wisps of red nebulae almost obscure the familiar outline of the constellation. Also in the pic, upper middle: the Pleiades.

Astronomy Picture of the Day, 31 Jan 2024: Camera Orion Rising. Go to this link and hover over the photo for identifications of the various sky objects.

\\\

This wackadoodle conspiracy theory involving Taylor Swift and the Super Bowl has reached the front page of the New York Times today.

Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Conservative Resistance, Politics, Psychology, Website Issues | Comments Off on Another Orion Photo

Those Who Believe Things that Are Not True, and Those Who Try Not To

  • There’s a spectrum of people from those who settle into narratives, believing things that are not true, and those who try to escape those narratives and try to perceive the real world;
  • Paul Krugman on how MAGA is not grounded in reality;
  • Right-wing obsessions with the Super-Bowl, and the congressional border bill, being “rigged,” for nefarious reasons; which I see as examples of the narrative bias gone carcinogenic;
  • Philip Glass’s String Quarter #5

I suppose everyone believes things that are not true, if only because of the intuitive biases inherent in human nature that evolved to help the species survive, intuitions that help us live in the world we experience (especially the ancestral world on the Savannah), one of particular scales and durations, yet which are *not* true when applied to other scales and durations. (These latter are where the best of science fiction chimes in.)

But some people believe more things that are not true than others. As in all things, there is a range, a spectrum, of attitudes; not a black and white divide. Humans are driven by narrative bias and tribalism, and so rely on flattering stories about their own tribes/communities/nations for group cohesion and survival, and can dismiss objective facts up to the point (or perhaps beyond [vaccines]) where such denial actually does harm. Many people live their entire lives inside such narratives, of religion or nationalism, and as long as they manage to reproduce and create the next generation, blissfully unaware of the vast universe around them, dismissal of those facts does little harm.

The scientist and philosopher tries to think around those biases of human nature, to rely on evidence and reasoning instead, in order to perceive the truth of the greater reality of the entire natural world, the cosmos. They try to escape the provincialism of self-enclosed narratives. They’re at the far end of the spectrum, and a tiny minority of the human race. But it’s that minority that has driven the advancement of the human race, in terms of knowledge and health and technology, and which has thus built the modern world.

\\

So perhaps the key question is, at what point does living inside a narrative, and believing things that are not true, do actual harm? If not to those inside that narrative, but to society in general, or even to the species?

Paul Krugman, NY Times, 29 Jan 2024 (though in today’s paper): MAGA Is Based on Fear, Not Grounded in Reality

Continue reading

Posted in Music, Philosophy, Physics, Politics, reality | Comments Off on Those Who Believe Things that Are Not True, and Those Who Try Not To

How Humans Select Particular Stories Over Reality

As I mentioned in Thursday’s post, I keep finding books in my library that could be considered straight-out philosophy (e.g. on ethics and morality) or at least philosophy-adjacent (some of the more abstruse physics and evolutionary texts, in the way they inform our apprehension of the nature of reality) than I’d thought to find. There is not a sharp division among these fields of thought. By the same token, it’s not that difficult to find correspondences, if not quite metaphorical alliances, between current news stories, and between them and the great philosophical concepts.

In modern parlance, these examples are about people in silos.

David French, NY Times Opinion, 28 Jan 2024: When the Right Ignores Its Sex Scandals

Continue reading

Posted in Narrative, Psychology, Religion | Comments Off on How Humans Select Particular Stories Over Reality

Humans Live By Telling Stories That Privilege Themselves

  • About Holocaust deniers;
  • About measles deniers;
  • About denial of sociology;
  • About the appeal of extinction panic.

Salon, Gary M. Kramer, 25 Jan 2024: “There will always be Holocaust deniers”: How “Zone of Interest” reveals unsettling truths about us, subtitled “The Oscar-nominated Johnnie Burn spoke to Salon about producing the sounds from the death camp next door”

This concerns a 2023 film I haven’t seen yet, though since it’s up for a bunch of Oscars, I might yet see it.

I’m mentioning it to make a broader point.

Continue reading

Posted in History, Narrative | Comments Off on Humans Live By Telling Stories That Privilege Themselves