Neopatriarchy, Tax Cuts, Conflict Entrepreneurs, and How the Nonreligious Might Save Humanity

Catching up on odds and ends today.

  • The Right’s “neopatricarchy” is nothing but a prioritization of tribal morality — that nothing matters than having more children;
  • Republicans are famous for bribing voters with tax cuts; now Democrats are doing it too, sigh;
  • Another item about “violent crime dropping sharply”;
  • Congress is dysfunctional because of “conflict entrepreneurs,” most of them Republican, of course;
  • How the nonreligious, given that they reproduce less than the religious, might be key to saving the race.

*

Vox, Zack Beauchamp, 13 Aug 2024: The right’s plan to fix America: Patriarchy 2.0, subtitled “JD Vance and like-minded conservatives are theorizing a kind of ‘neopatriarchy.'”

Once again: an obsession with tribal morality. To conservatives, nothing else matters than having more children, apparently.

Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Religion | Comments Off on Neopatriarchy, Tax Cuts, Conflict Entrepreneurs, and How the Nonreligious Might Save Humanity

Tara Westover: EDUCATED: A MEMOIR

And here’s a third memoir I read recently, inspired by that NYT list — though in this case, the book didn’t place on the final list, though it was nominated by a couple of the 500 contributors who revealed their personal votes. And I had a copy — again, as with Coates, bought sometime after first publication. I have the 19th printing.

What attracted me to this was its story about growing up in rural Idaho, in a survivalist family, and then breaking out and discovering the real world. Just up my alley, right? Knowledge wins out? As it turned out, that’s only part of the story, and not even the main point.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Culture, Religion | Comments Off on Tara Westover: EDUCATED: A MEMOIR

Things That Don’t Change

In particular, the reactions by conservatives to things that do change. Topics today:

  1. Illegals and the military;
  2. How poor poll results must be fake;
  3. The American struggle between reason and ignorance;
  4. How one small town is indeed deeply conservative;
  5. Considering the assumption that people become more conservative as they grow older;
  6. When you have no substantive arguments, resort to the trivial: Doritos!

1, Scaring Conservatives with Lies

Salon, Kelly McClure, 17 Aug 2024: Trump scares his followers with talk of “illegals,” but border crossings are lowest in four years, subtitled “A new tally by border agents shows that illegal crossings are at a steady decline, down 32 percent since June”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Culture, Politics | Comments Off on Things That Don’t Change

Ta-Nehisi Coates: BETWEEN THE WORLD AND ME

Here is the next memoir I read, after Joan Didion’s, as inspired by that NYT list. This is a statement by a black intellectual to his 15-year-old son, about life as a black person and the struggles and dangers he faces in the world. It’s heartfelt and moving and grim and blunt. Its function to readers like me is to reveal perspectives I’ve never had, and couldn’t even imagine.

The book came out in 2015 and I have the 20th printing — with blurbs on the cover about it being a bestseller, and a National Book Award winner. So I didn’t buy it when first published. Its subject is nothing obviously up my alley. Presumably after a year of acclaim, and since frankly that it was short!, I did buy a copy, in April 2016.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Culture | Comments Off on Ta-Nehisi Coates: BETWEEN THE WORLD AND ME

Preferred Relativism

  • A story about the right’s “50-year-plot” to wreck democracy, and attendant thoughts about how conservatives reject one kind of relativism, and embrace another;
  • The credulousness of conservatives;
  • Notes from the fringe: vaccines; rationalizing Hannibal Lecter; Democrats are wolves; wives afraid of husbands seeing their votes; Trump’s endless false claims.
– – –

Here’s a piece today that caught my eye because I wondered if it aligns with other recent pieces about the history of the past few decades — the conservative swing into existential panic ever since civil rights movement in the 1960s; yesterday’s piece about the rise of the “nones,” itself a reaction to conservative extremism. As it turned out, it’s interesting as much for prompting thoughts about ‘relativism.’

Salon, Andrew O’Hehir, 16 Aug 2024: Unpacking the right’s “50-year plot” to wreck democracy — and why it might work, subtitled “Author David Daley on the far right’s long-term “Antidemocratic” strategy, and how we just might beat it”

This is an interview with David Daley, author of a new book, Antidemocratic: Inside the Far Right’s 50-Year Plot to Control American Elections, just published on August 6th.

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Morality, Science | Comments Off on Preferred Relativism

Nones, and Genre

  • Why did the rise of the “nones” begin in the 1990s?
  • Thoughts about how science fiction is, or is not, a “genre”.

Here’s an article I stumbled upon today, from 2019 in The Atlantic, by a writer I’ve see a lot of lately but apparently had not noticed back then. And this relates to yesterday’s lead item.

Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Religion, science fiction | Comments Off on Nones, and Genre

Seculars, Human Nature, Abstraction

Some more abstract, intellectual topics for today.

  • As the rise of ‘nones’ increases, what will society look like in a hundred years?
  • How people are instinctively nice, more often than religions give them credit;
  • An idea from S.I. Hayakawa about a ‘ladder of abstraction’ for communication skills.

OnlySky, Bruce Ledewitz, 14 Aug 2024: From secular society to secular civilization, subtitled “In a hundred years, the Nones will likely be a majority of the US population. What will that secular society be like?”

OnlySky is back, but only publishing one new item every day or two. My initial reaction to this piece, at least the subtitle, Continue reading

Posted in Morality, Religion, Social Progress | Comments Off on Seculars, Human Nature, Abstraction

They’re Losing It

  • Trump and conservatives deny everything they don’t like by blaming “they” or the “Deep State”;
  • And hurling words like “communist” without meaning;
  • Why are we living in a future dominated by idiots?;
  • Donald Trump doesn’t understand oceans;
  • And the brother of pastor who claimed his pro-Trump prophecies came from God calls fake. Well of course.

Salon, Amanda Marcotte, 13 Aug 2024: Donald Trump’s “fake crowd” lie about Kamala Harris shows how much he’s lost it since January 6, subtitled “It’s the same coping mechanism MAGA used to deny the popularity of Taylor Swift and the Barbie movie”

More about Trump’s claims about Harris’s crowds. It’s sad. Everything that goes wrong for conservatives is always about the mysterious “they”…

\

… or the equally mysterious and fantastical “Deep State.”

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Lunacy, Politics | Comments Off on They’re Losing It

Joan Didion, THE YEAR OF MAGICAL THINKING

Inspired by that NY Times list of the 100 Best Books of the 21st Century, I read three short memoirs that I already had copies of in my library. Here’s the first. (These will be briefer ‘short takes’ compared to my usual lengthy summaries with comments.)

I’d read bits of a couple other Didion books before this one came out in 2005, and it must have gotten some buzz, because I bought it right away; my copy is a “second printing before publication.” Maybe I was intrigued by the title, too.

(Knopf, Oct 2005, 227pp.)

Didion, who died in 2021, was a novelist, essayist and screenwriter, and she was married to John Gregory Dunne, also a novelist and screenwriter. (They wrote the film True Confessions together, based on his novel.)

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes | Comments Off on Joan Didion, THE YEAR OF MAGICAL THINKING

Why Do You “Believe”? Who Do You Trust?

One item for today, about which I think is a key principle.

NY Times, Zeynep Tufekci, 12 Aug 2024: The Problem Is Not A.I. It’s the Disbelief Created by Trump.

This triggers off the recent news items about Trump’s skepticism about the crowds at Kamala Harris’ events. Ironically, he’s accusing her big crowds of being faked, by AI. (Note again: projection.) Tufekci:

Continue reading

Posted in Epistemology, Politics | Comments Off on Why Do You “Believe”? Who Do You Trust?