Today’s New Insight

  • What ‘woke’ means, to different people;
  • How the ancients overcame biases in understanding the world, in order to discover and navigate the world;
  • How moderns have tried to overcome cognitive biases through constitutions and “political correctness” and being “woke,” and have been bitterly opposed by conservatives, who prefer tribal morality, to this day;
  • And so the insight: the ancients overcame human psychological biases about the shape of the world, because they had economic incentives for doing so; yet despite their success, millennia later there are still flat-earthers. While attempts to overcome tribalist human nature has led to grand movements like the US Constitution, yet most people to this day prefer tribalist mindsets: see conservatives.
  • And so: human nature is inescapable. The dreams of utopias are likely only dreams.

This item on Jerry Coyne’s site today — combined with following the implications of thought in yesterday’s blog post — suggested to me a new fundamental insight.

Jerry Coyne, Why Evolution Is True, Are we past peak woke in America?

Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy, Science, Social Progress | Comments Off on Today’s New Insight

Admitted Liars; Presumptions of the Ancients

  • Republicans repeatedly are admitting they lie;
  • How Republicans voters trust Trump as a source of election information;
  • Reading Timothy Ferris, revisiting the ancient astronomers and their presumptions about the universe — not unlike the modern discovery of psychology biases.

Increasingly, they’re saying it aloud, admitting that they’re lying because they can get away with it, and their goals justify it (a rationale I’ve long noticed).

AlterNet, David Badah, 19 Sep 2024: Yes, Republicans are lying — and they’re not going to stop: ‘Enjoy it’

Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, conservatives, Lunacy, Psychology, Science | Comments Off on Admitted Liars; Presumptions of the Ancients

Alarmism About Culture

  • A disgruntled French intellectual on “deculturation” sounds a lot like MAGA;
  • Shorter items about how a mother died due to Georgia’s abortion ban; how conservatives see everything they don’t like is a judgement from their God; how Trump supporters are subject to motivated reasoning and confirmation bias; Paul Krugman on how Trumponomics is even worse than “trickle-down” economics; about Trump’s superlatives and hyperbole; how Trump believes his own hype; and how Trump brags about reactions from an audience that wasn’t there.

NY Times, Joshua Rothman, 17 Sep 2024: Is Culture Dying?, subtitled “The French sociologist Olivier Roy believes that “deculturation” is sweeping the world, with troubling consequences.”

Heh. Haven’t read this yet, but it’s easy to imagine what he might claim. The solution would be about scope, and understanding inevitable change.

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Culture, Economics, Politics | Comments Off on Alarmism About Culture

Stories Are Not Evidence

  • How the right “creates stories” to support their worldview (i.e. they’re all about motivated reasoning);
  • Paul Krugman on Trump, tariffs, Stalin, and Lysenko;
  • Items about DeSantis cheating and which party is the party of violence;
  • Items about a brain fever brought on by voting for Democrats; Satanic interdimensional invasions; and how Republicans think anyone unlike them is suspect, perhaps subhuman.
  • Trying to recall Bright Eyes, or Conor Oberst

Media Matters, Matt Gertz, 16 Sep 2024: MAGA runs wild with random poster’s “ABC whistleblower” claims, subtitled “How the right works to “create stories'”

Continue reading

Posted in Economics, Lunacy, Music, Narrative, Politics | Comments Off on Stories Are Not Evidence

Passages from Brian Greene and Richard Dawkins

How unusual is this? An esteemed scientist, Brian Greene, with an Opinion piece in a major paper. (I just reviewed his book UNTIL THE END OF TIME ending here.)

Washington Post, Brian Greene, 16 Sep 2024: Opinion | Decades later, string theory continues its march toward Einstein’s dream, subtitled “Why we must keep investigating physics’ most tantalizing theory — even without experimental results.”

The gist about string theory is whether it “explains” anything except mathematically, though without generating predictions that might be experimentally tested. It goes to the very nature of what science is.

Continue reading

Posted in Cosmology, Evolution | Comments Off on Passages from Brian Greene and Richard Dawkins

Education vs. Conservatives

  • Why should a ‘diverse’ campus include conservatives who are essentially against education?
  • Paul Krugman on the eternal demonization of immigrants by conservatives;
  • Short items about Vance’s fantasies, his aim simply to get media attention, and Trump’s clueless accusations about harsh language.

Here’s a venerable issue that has an obvious answer.

NY Times, Jennifer Schuessler, 14 Sep 2024: Should a ‘Diverse’ Campus Mean More Conservatives?, subtitled “Republicans are demanding colleges embrace ‘viewpoint diversity.’ They aren’t the only ones who are concerned.”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Education, Politics | Comments Off on Education vs. Conservatives

Distrust of Science and of Public Schools

  • Thomas B. Edsall on the roots of MAGA’s distrust of science;
  • Hemant Mehta on evangelicals and public schools.

NY Times, guest essay by Thomas B. Edsall, 11 Sep 2024: MAGA vs. Science Is No Contest [Gift Link]

I’ve mentioned before that Edsall’s occasional columns are rather like my blog posts, in that they link and quote from a variety of different sources to illuminate a particular theme from various angles. This column is about conservative, in particular MAGA, antipathy toward science. Well, we know what. Can we extract any general principles? Rather that quote his quotes I’ll just bullet point the key ideas that jump out at me.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Education, Religion, Science | Comments Off on Distrust of Science and of Public Schools

Regression Toward the Tribal

Let’s see now. Here we are in the 21st century. In the past 500 years humankind has shown remarkable progress on two parallel fronts. Along governance: no longer was the divine right of kings (or tribal leaders) recognized; rather, principles of self-governance were developed, notably in the United States Constitution in which, supposedly, all men were “equal” at least before the law and as voting citizens. Along matters of science and understanding reality: no longer was authority on such matters granted to holy books and their spokesmen; rather consensus on reality was granted to the evidence of the world around us, along with a healthy system of self-criticism, so that errors in understanding would eventually be recognized and corrected.

Why is that “progress”? Because these systems enabled the human population of the world, as it expanded so that no one tribe (city/nation) could exist apart from all the others, to get along with one another, and agree upon a consensus reality.

And yet now, in parts of the US at least, they have apparently stopped working, and we’re beginning to see the consequences. In the US, a large portion of the population rejects democracy, and rejects science. Where will this lead us?

This week’s issue about Haitian immigrants in Springfield Ohio supposedly eating pet cats and dogs is utterly absurd and trivial, on its surface, and yet the more it endures in the daily news cycle, the more it represents the breakdown of the consensus reality that has enabled the United States, and the modern world in both the West and elsewhere, to endure and become powerful. I’ve wondered before if it’s possible for society and its technology to depend on a minority who do understand science and technology, even as most of the rest of the population disbelieves in it while nevertheless depending on it.

\\

The story about Haitians eating pets derived from a single Facebook post based on third- and fourth-hand reports. This is a classic lesson in understanding why not to believe anything based on secondary reports.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Epistemology, History, Human Progress, Politics, Science | Comments Off on Regression Toward the Tribal

Fear vs. Hope

  • An essay about “contrasting views of reality” by the American right and the left;
  • Short items about MAGA and pets; Republicans and raunch; Laura Loomer; Buttigieg explains Trump; Lance Wallnau blames witchcraft; and Trump’s new big lie about crime;
  • And how Fox News keeps the MAGA faithful in a state of blissful ignorance.

Let’s take a look at another big picture essay, looking beyond current politics to the big ways people think about the world. I’ve captured some ideas about this already, in that table of moral polarities, which I recently suggested might be characterized as being more broadly about Human Nature, Morality, and Politics. From Haidt, we know of dueling grand narratives: the struggle to return to a golden past, on the right; the struggle for equality and happiness, on the left. This piece seems to be aligned the same way. (And where do most science fiction writers and readers lie…? One guess.)

NY Times, Peter Baker, 11 Sep 2024: Harris and Trump Bet on Their Own Sharply Contrasting Views of America, subtitled “Former President Donald J. Trump is gambling that Americans are as angry as he is, while Vice President Kamala Harris hopes voters are exhausted by the Trump era and ready to move on.” [gift link]

Continue reading

Posted in Human Nature, Politics, Psychology | Comments Off on Fear vs. Hope

The Debate, Politics, and Science

  • How Kamala Harris defended fracking and did not properly address climate change;
  • How nothing about science came up in the debate;
  • Short items: How MAGA will fall for anything; how Trumps confessed he’s unprepared; how the GOP has become the party of racist memes; how voodoo is real; how MAGA doesn’t acknowledge that Trump sucks; how Fox is more concerned about “vibes” rather than actual falling crime rates; and another lie about Usher endorsing Harris.

In the fallout from the Harris/Trump debate the other night, a couple substantial items came up today. And there’s also another batch of dispatches from crazy-land.

Salon, Matthew Rozsa, 12 Sep 2024: Harris may have “won” the debate, but Americans “lost on fracking,” climate experts say, subtitled “Climate change scientists reacting to the Harris-Trump debate say we can’t keep propping up fossil fuels”

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Evolution, Lunacy, Politics | Comments Off on The Debate, Politics, and Science