Notes from the Reality-Based Community

  • Hemant Mehta on a new wave of atheist content creators;
  • Scientific “groupthink” is a myth, an effect of how our fundamental theories are extremely successful;
  • Richard Dawkins can’t understand how Tom Holland and his readers believe ancient legends and myths are literally true;
  • (My comment: especially when they don’t trust modern media to get yesterday’s news right);
  • Short items about Reagan, Grokipedia, living on military bases, nuclear weapons, those Aryan posters, predator pastors, and Trump’s agenda.
– – –

Let’s give Hemant Mehta his due when he says his post today is an important one. (Why? Because he’s trying to be positive, instead of relentlessly negative in reporting about the religious shenanigans going on every day in the world.)

Friendly Atheist, Hemant Mehta, 30 Oct 2025: How the American Humanist Association is empowering a new wave of atheist content creators, subtitled “A quiet experiment could redefine how secular voices reach millions online and revive a movement that’s lost momentum”

A few months ago, I was given the Humanist Media Award from the American Humanist Association. Rather than speak directly about my own work, I used my time to highlight a growing concern I’ve had about the broader atheism movement.

Continue reading

Posted in Psychology, Religion, Science | Comments Off on Notes from the Reality-Based Community

Sam Harris: THE MORAL LANDSCAPE

Subtitled “How Science Can Determine Human Values”
(Free Press, Oct. 2010, 291pp, including 100pp of acknowledgements, notes, references, and index)

Sam Harris came to fame in the years after 9/11 for writing a critique of religion called THE END OF FAITH. He, along with writers of later books, Daniel Dennett and Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, became known as the “four horsemen” of the “new atheists”. I reread that book a few years ago and reviewed it here. The present book followed in 2010, and I read it the first time in 2014 and quoted from it a bit in this post. Then I reread this book about three years ago and took detailed notes, which I’m now summarizing here.

\\

Gist: Harris is challenging the nostrum that science can tell us about the world but not about how to behave: that is, science can have nothing to say about morality. Yes it can, he claims, essentially by applying a utilitarian policy upon the world: design society to maximize the happiness, or well-being, of as many people possible. Further, what science can say avoids the trap of inconsistent religions making contradictory, and incorrect, claims about the nature of reality

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Morality, Religion | Comments Off on Sam Harris: THE MORAL LANDSCAPE

Useful Categories

  • Five ideas to tell when America has become a dictatorship;
  • A Jesus and Mo cartoon that reflects my discussions of secular awe and religion;
  • Phil Zuckerman on how social justice is secular;
  • Short items about worries of American’s impending population collapse, national emergencies and election fraud, the firing of the commission on design, how Musk’s project is cribbing from Wikipedia, and yet another example of conservative bigotry and nonsense.
– – –

Slate, Herb Bowman, 29 Oct 2025: How Will You Know That America Has Become a Dictatorship? After 20 Years Living in One, I Can Tell You.
Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Morality, Politics, Science | Comments Off on Useful Categories

Moral Rot

  • Paul Krugman on food stamps/SNAP; the common conservative belief that recipients are malingerers; and some facts about who actually gets those benefits;
  • The Labor Department’s white supremacist posters;
  • Short items;
  • Dr. Warren J. Blumenfeld on Trump’s disrespect, and how he’s wrong in the head.
– – –

Paul Krugman, 28 Oct 2025: The Hunger Games Begin, subtitled “40 million Americans are about to lose food stamps”

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Morality | Comments Off on Moral Rot

What People Know, and What They Want

  • What undecided voters say they are concerned about, vs. reality;
  • Tom Tomorrow on effect and cause, within the Trump administration;
  • An OnlySky piece by Michael Carteron about the paradox of modern life;
  • Jerry Coyne on Charles Murray’s “God-sized hole”;
  • My thoughts about the need for someone to take care of you.
– – –

The Bulwark, Jonathan V. Last, 27 Oct 2025: The Lies They Tell Themselves, subtitled “A conversation with voters about The Real Issues.”

The writer participates in some sort of focus group surveying undecided voters in New Jersey, and concludes:

Some large portion of voters do not appear to understand elementary, objective aspects of reality.

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Human Nature, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on What People Know, and What They Want

Drizzly

  • Intro;
  • Are religions by their nature fascist?
  • Latest on the Republican war on science;
  • Peanut allergies go away when infants are exposed early on;
  • Takes on what socialism is.
– – –

It was drizzly all weekend. Yesterday we attended a birthday party for grandson Nicholas, at a park in Alameda, despite weather predictions of light rain. The rain mostly let up by noon (we were there at 11) but resumed with drizzle before we packed up and left. Today, more shifting forecasts of rain this afternoon, changing every time I looked at the weather app on my phone. As I did earlier in the week, by chance, I went out for a walk during what turned out to be the lightest drizzle of the day; now, despite earlier forecasts, it’s not just drizzling, it’s raining.

\\\

Several substantial leftover items from the past week.

\

Are religions by their nature fascist? Is this an impertinent question, or a dumb one?

I’m recalling the nutshell definition of fascism in Heather Cox Richardson’s book (review begins here).

…The US has an actual history of struggles, leading to the idea that all people are equal. Fascism, in contrast, was based on the idea that some people are better than others, and deserved to rule.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Religion, Science, Social Progress | Comments Off on Drizzly

Disintegration

  • The Pentagon Press Corps;
  • Trump’s pardons;
  • Charlie Kirk;
  • The East Wing and the new ballroom, with an analysis that suggests the proposed ballroom is not real;
  • Short items.
– – –

What’s new?

\

Propaganda, not news.

Slate, Molly Olmstead, 24 Oct 2025: The New Pentagon Press Corps Is … Really Something, subtitled “Legitimate journalists declined to agree to absurd eligibility rules for Pentagon press passes. Trump’s team is very excited about their replacements.”

The Gateway Pundit, RedState, LindellTV, OAN, and The Epoch Times, among others.
Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Politics | Comments Off on Disintegration

They’re Already Here

About transcendence, and alien intelligence.

More about “transcendence,” and quibbling with that essay I linked yesterday. It said this:

Transcendence—basically, the human experience of a higher and deeper reality somehow hidden in our everyday existences, but giving hints of itself in certain circumstances—is a constant phenomenon across time and cultures. … Without any form of supernatural existence, what could transcendence be about?

The error is tying the perception of something “higher and deeper” than our everyday existence, with religion.

Continue reading

Posted in Human Nature, Psychology, Science | Comments Off on They’re Already Here

Transcendence, and Science Fiction

  • Writers keep puzzling about the idea of transcendence and its association with religion; I’ve proposed an answer;
  • Local news about federal agents in Alameda, near me, and how Trump called them off today;
  • Heather Cox Richardson about the destruction of the East Wing of the White House; Karoline Leavitt on Trump’s unilateral power;
  • Short takes about capitalists, how Democrats should commit to restoring the East Wing, how MAGA thirsts to find evidence of left-wing violence, and Robert Reich on the second gilded age’s billionaire’s ballroom.
– – –

OnlySky, Bruce Ledewitz, 22 Oct 2025: The lure of the transcendent, subtitled “We need a secular framework for human experiences of awe and deep meaning.”

I’m reading this essay for the first time as I post. Going in, I’m puzzled by the premise. Since feelings of awe and deep meaning do exist, they are obviously related to something other that the (non)existence of various supernatural beings. Which came first? Why would feelings of awe have evolved if they weren’t perceptions of the supernatural? (And if the supernatural were real — why the special feelings?) A while back I read a book called AWE (review here), which I was not deeply impressed by, especially since the author didn’t address the science fictional idea of “sense of wonder” (which I do in my essay).

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Science | Comments Off on Transcendence, and Science Fiction

Demolition

  • Trump demolishes the East Wing, after promising not to;
  • Michelle Goldberg about MAGA;
  • Robert Reich on options to challenge the right’s “hate America” rhetoric;
  • Short items about how Christians should be in charge of everything, how MAGA hates people from India too, and Bill Maher on how if you’re a racist, you’re probably Republican.
– – –

A few days ago Trump said his new ballroom would be close to but wouldn’t affect the existing East Wing. This week, he’s had the entire East Wing torn down, with no due process for how construction projects are usually built or torn down.

CNN, 22 Oct 2025: Why Trump’s sudden East Wing demolition is extraordinary — and dicey
Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Lunacy | Comments Off on Demolition