Morality Wars

  • Trump declares Democrats as the greatest enemy of America;
  • Trump demands election rigging plan be approved “for Jesus”;
  • Why do MAGA keep supporting Trump? Perhaps some kind of selective, “vertical”, morality;
  • How Trump has cultivated the ugliest passions within the GOP;
  • Robert Reich predicts Trump will surrender but call it a victory.
– – –

Widely reported today.

Mediaite, 22 Mar 2026: Trump Declares ‘The Death of Iran’ — Then Brands Democratic Party America’s ‘Greatest Enemy’ in Stunning Post

“Now with the death of Iran, the greatest enemy America has is the Radical Left, Highly Incompetent, Democrat Party!” Trump wrote.

So he’s declaring half the country to be the enemy of “America” — which he implicitly defines as MAGA and his supporters. Doesn’t he realize that, at least nominally, he’s supposed to be the president of the entire United States? Apparently not. Or is he declaring a civil war?

\\\

Here is Trump pandering to his people.

Mirror, Mikey Smith in Washington DC, today: Donald Trump demands election rigging plan be approved ‘for Jesus’ in deranged rant.

Subtitle: Giving a speech in Memphis, Tennessee, Trump said he was going to order Republicans to withhold funding from the Department of Homeland Security until the Senate passes his bill to pass the so-called “SAVE America Act”

The reason Democrats don’t support the SAVE act, aside from the difficulties it imposes on people the Republicans would rather not vote, is that Republicans refuse to include provisions requiring ICE agents to follow the Constitution. Maybe the Democrats should ask why can’t they follow the Constitution for Jesus?

\\\

How can MAGA claim to be Christian while supporting Trump? A long answer.

HuffPost, Caroline Bologna, 21 Mar 2026: ‘Vertical Morality’ Might Describe Why MAGA Christians Seem So Unchristian, subtitled “This framework reveals why some MAGA-aligned Christians act in ways that contradict Jesus’ teachings.”

For many Americans, the gap between Christian teachings and MAGA politics is baffling. How can people profess faith in Jesus ― who preached love, mercy and care for the oppressed ― while supporting policies that punish immigrants, demonize LGBTQ people and glorify cruelty?

The key to understanding this apparent contradiction might lie in something called “vertical morality.”

This ethical framework measures righteousness not by goodness to others, but by something more simplistic.

Defining things, quoting activist Rachel Klinger Cain.

“Vertical morality is just how I describe what’s called ‘divine command theory’ in metaethics,” she said. “I’m a teacher, so I’m always looking for ways to make complicated concepts a little more simple. It’s basically the idea that morality comes from authority above, which is what I was taught when I was raised within conservative Christianity.”

Vertical morality stands in contrast to the concept of horizontal morality, another term Klinger Cain has broken down in her videos.

“Horizontal morality prioritizes the well-being of our neighbors, communities and personal relationships,” Ajoy explained. “We act in ways that cause the least amount of harm to those around us, regardless of beliefs. Someone with vertical morality may help someone in need because they believe that’s what God wants them to do, versus someone with horizontal morality may help that same person for the benefit of the person that needs help.”

Other key bits:

“Evangelicals are taught that all morality comes from God and therefore true goodness can only be spread by obeying God, even if it harms people around us,” Ajoy said. “This isn’t necessarily a bad thing if pleasing God manifests by following the teachings of Jesus ― loving our neighbors, loving our enemies, promoting peace and taking care of the poor, the widow, the immigrant and standing up for the marginalized. It becomes dangerous when Christians weaponize this vertical morality for power, which is exactly what we’re seeing with the Christian nationalism in the Trump administration.”

In the current era, conservative Christian nationalists see anyone on their political team as good and on God’s side, while those who oppose them as evil and satanic.

“What’s interesting is that Jesus taught a compassionate, flexible, grace-filled view of what it means to live a life loving God,” Levings noted. “But today’s conservative Christianity is less influenced by Jesus and more by the Old Testament and Paul.”

Exactly the point I’ve made over and over. And, this attitude:

“It predates Jesus, and it’s disinterested in evidence, science, progress, research, experience or the inclusion of other worldviews,” Levings said. “Theonomy is part of the Reformed theology that’s been growing in the evangelical movement for the past 30 years.”

And from author April Ajoy:

“The problem with MAGA Christians is that they promote policies that often go against the teachings of Jesus,” Ajoy said. “They justify it by promoting a view of God that is vengeful. They demonize all immigrants as criminals, all queer people as predators, all leftists as violent and all Democrats as satanic ― with no evidence to back these claims. And because they believe in a literal hell and a God-ordained calling to make the nation Christian, they justify cruelty in the name of ‘tough love.’”

Quite a long article, hitting familiar themes, from immigrants to the Ku Klux Klan. It’s about hierarchy. Morals come from God. Believers next. And unbelievers on some lower plane. Simplistic, tribal.

Of course, morality does not come from God; it evolved over hundreds of thousands of years because it enabled those to accomplish more, to cooperate, to develop larger towns and civilizations, greater trade networks and contacts with the outer world, than the xenophobic, superstitious tribalists who never did. The deeper explanation, which the article does not recognize, is that the motives of these vertical moralists reflect base human nature, while the horizontal moralists reflect a mature human nature, analogous to the many ways this span has been described. Deep in their guts, conservatives are more comfortable with the OT than with whatever Jesus said, which some now dismiss as being too “woke.”

\\\

And again.

The Atlantic, Peter Wehner, 23 Mar 2026: How Trump Killed Conservatism, subtitled “The president has cultivated and encouraged the ugliest passions within the GOP, dousing the embers of hate with kerosene.”

The “Make America Great Again” movement is the beating heart of the GOP, the dominant political party in America—which makes MAGA the most important political movement in the world. And that is why some recent developments within the MAGA movement are so disquieting.

Going on with examples from today’s young Republicans.

\\\

Robert Reich predicts.

Robert Reich, today: Why He’ll Surrender Soon, subtitled “But he’ll call it a great victory”

No one knows what Trump is going to do from minute to minute, least of all Trump. But it’s looking ever more likely he’ll be exiting Iran within days, declaring his “excursion” into it (as he’s termed his war) a major victory — and then changing the subject.

Because he’s done this kind of thing before. And his supporters will believe that he actually accomplished something, because he told them so.

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Human Nature, Politics | Comments Off on Morality Wars

Skiffy Flix: It Came from Outer Space

Returning to our ongoing series.

It Came from Outer Space is a 1953 film directed by Jack Arnold (who did some similar movies in the same era) and based on a story treatment by Ray Bradbury (not a published short story). Despite the poster above, the DVD I watched was in black and white, and there was no 3-D effect (I wonder how they did a 3-D effect in black and white).

This film has similarities with others skiffy films of its era, yet it has certain charms, and it ends much more positively that most of those others.

Here’s the Wikipedia entry for this film.

Summary of plot:
Continue reading

Posted in Skiffy Flix | Comments Off on Skiffy Flix: It Came from Outer Space

What It Means to Think That God Is On Your Side

  • Concerning Hegseth, Trump, and Rubio;
  • Also, how do religious sects decide when to reinterpret their scriptures?
  • Items about 100% approval, teleportation, church/state separation, and uncounted COVID deaths;
  • FBers compare reactions to Charlie Kirk’s death to Trump’s reaction to Robert Mueller’s death;
  • And David Brin notes a similar comparison between Cesar Chavez and the people the right defends.
– – –

Everyone thinks God is on their side. Don’t they realize this?

NY Times, 20 Mar 2026: Hegseth Invokes Divine Purpose to Justify Military Might, subtitled “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has imbued U.S. military actions with a Christian moral underpinning that suggests they are divinely sanctioned.”
Continue reading

Posted in Lunacy, Politics, Psychology, Religion | Comments Off on What It Means to Think That God Is On Your Side

Ziya Tong; THE REALITY BUBBLE

Subtitled: Blind Spots, Hidden Truths, and the Dangerous Illusions that Shape Our World
(Penguin Canada: Allen Lane, 2019, 366pp, including 15pp of acknowledgements and index.)

This is a pleasant enough book by a Canadian journalist. Her broad point is that there are many things about the world that most of us are unaware of, living as we do in a “reality bubble.” One way this is true is that many things are the way they are by convention, not because we live by some unalterable rules. Example: time zones. (This aligns with a key theme of science fiction: things might well be different in ways that wouldn’t occur to most people.) Another way this is true is that some things that we’re unaware of are just about the complexity of life. No one can, or necessarily needs to, understand all the details of where our food comes from. And a third way is more fundamental, that reality really does constrain what we perceive and what we don’t. Example of the electromagnetic spectrum and how humans perceive only a small fraction of it. There are lots of examples along all three of these themes… But they strike me as separate themes, analogous only in the broadest sense. So this is sort of a three-books-in-one. This is understandable, perhaps, in that the author is a journalist, for TV and radio, and presumably has been open to topics of all sorts that would be suitable science-oriented programming. (Also, very broadly, it aligns with similar works by Gladwell, Freakonomics, etc etc. But not in a hard science way.)
Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Human Progress, reality | Comments Off on Ziya Tong; THE REALITY BUBBLE

Misconceptions about Science and Predictions

  • How Jeffrey Epstein, obsessed with eugenics, was wrong;
  • How Paul Ehrlich was not a villain, even though his predictions failed;
  • John Pavlovitz wonders why anyone still supports Trump; I have another idea;
  • Tom Nichols on no Plan B; the disappearing Charlie Kirk banner;
  • Rufus Wainwright’s “Go Or Go Ahead”.
– – –

Evolution is the scientific topic about which even people who don’t reject it utterly still have more misconceptions about than any other branch of science. (Going back to Lamarckism, or the inheritance of acquired characteristics, that people like Lysenko and Stalin so much wanted to be true it became Soviet doctrine for decades.) I think it must reflect the teleological mode of most human thinking.

Slate, Susanne Paola Antonetta, 19 Mar 2026: Jeffrey Epstein, Eugenics Supremacist, subtitled “The files reveal his obsession with genetics. But genes don’t work the way he thought.”
Continue reading

Posted in Evolution, Lunacy, Music, Politics, Science | Comments Off on Misconceptions about Science and Predictions

Donald Hoffman: THE CASE AGAINST REALITY

Subtitle: Why evolution hid the truth from our eyes
(Norton, 2019, 250pp, plus color plates, including 45pp acknowledgements, notes, and index.)

This is the first of three books I read in January, all with ostensibly similar themes, but actually quite different from one another in their perspectives and ultimate intents.

This one, for example, isn’t about evolution per se, as the subtitle suggests; it’s about how humans don’t perceive “true” reality, but only perceive reality in the sense of what is necessary for humans to survive and reproduce. OK, fine. I’ve made the same general point before. But he goes farther: he suggests that when we’re not looking at the moon, for example, the moon doesn’t exist. This goes back to certain philosophers, and sounds fatuous, and can only be true in the sense that humanity’s *conception* of what the moon is – filtered through our senses and our priorities for survival – ceases to exist when we’re not looking at it. It can’t mean that the physical object, the moon, that triggered our perceptions in the first place, ceases to exist. Yet he doesn’t want to spell this out; he leaves us with the impression that the actual moon ceases to exist when we’re not looking at it. Which I think is fatuous, and solipsistic.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Evolution, reality | Comments Off on Donald Hoffman: THE CASE AGAINST REALITY

Latter Day Skiffy Flix: STTNG: Encounter at Farpoint

A couple evenings ago I rewatched the pilot episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, called “Encounter at Farpoint,” for the first time since I watched it as the series premiere back in 1987.

Continue reading

Posted in Personal history, science fiction, Skiffy Flix, Star Trek | Comments Off on Latter Day Skiffy Flix: STTNG: Encounter at Farpoint

Increasing Willful Ignorance and Intolerance

  • How energy independence, which even Fox News once thought could avoid the quandary we now face in the Strait or Hormuz, is now regarded as a scam by the likes of JD Vance;
  • How Trump and MAGA are all for religious freedom… for Christians, but definitely not for Muslims;
  • While MAGA Christians want to repeal the 19th amendment and be much more intolerant toward ‘Satanic’ nonbelievers;
  • The White House Cage Match, and a Newsmax Host’s eagerness to punch people: are conservatives prone to settling disputes with violence? (Also yesterday’s item about guns);
  • The kids are all right, say new studies, better than previous generations, and the various psychological reasons many people believe otherwise.
– – –

We have only conservatives to blame.

Media Matters, Allison Fisher, 18 Mar 2026: Fox personalities used to claim that energy independence would shield the US from potential retaliatory action by Iran — such as closing the Strait of Hormuz, subtitled “As gas prices rise, the network has scarcely invoked the concept of ‘energy independence,’ mentioning it a fraction as often as it did during the start of the Russia-Ukraine war”

Hmm, why would that be? Perhaps because the current administration thinks energy independence is a scam.
Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Psychology | Comments Off on Increasing Willful Ignorance and Intolerance

The War, the Economy, and Religion

  • Yet more commentators on the stupidity of this war with Iran, from Adam Lee, Suzanne Maloney, and Susan B. Glasser;
  • How the economies under Biden and Trump aren’t that much different;
  • Brief items about why conservatives need guns, Christian Nationalists who admit they mean to impose their morality on everyone, how the transgender plague is driven by demons, hurricanes, tricks, and Christian theology;
  • And two examples of the first lesson of comparative religion, for conservatives.
– – –

Adam Lee on the war.

OnlySky, Adam Lee, 18 Mar 2026: The colossal stupidity of war with Iran, subtitled “An unwinnable war without a goal and with consequences for the world.”

If anyone still doubted that Donald Trump will be remembered as the worst president of all time, he’s doing his best to eliminate that doubt.

Last month, America and Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran, assassinating Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior Iranian military officials. (We also accidentally bombed a school, killing over a hundred children.)

This is all the more hypocritical because isolationism used to be one of Trump’s defining policy stances. As a candidate, he railed against politicians whom he said would get us bogged down in wars:

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on The War, the Economy, and Religion

Is Trump Insane, Delusional, or Merely an Inveterate Liar?

  • Trump claims a former president supports his actions in Iran; the four living former presidents all deny it;
  • Many on the extreme right sound insane to the rest of us, with examples;
  • Trump is pressuring the media to support his war, as authoritarians do;
  • Yet another example of how Trump is only transactional, without principles;
  • John Pavlovitz on how MAGA Americans will feign ignorance of the Trump administration, jut as Germans did about the NAZIs.
  • A report on the health of Democracies around the world is unsurprising concerning the US;
  • Anne Applebaum on how everyone but Trump understands what he’s done;
  • Philip Glass’s Monsters of Grace.
– – –

Today’s story about crazy Trump.

NY Times, 16 Mar 2026: Trump Claims an Ex-President Confided His Regrets on Iran. But Who?, subtitled “The New York Times reached out to people close to President Trump’s predecessors. They disputed Mr. Trump’s claims.”

President Trump claimed on Monday that a former president told him privately that “I wish I did what you did” in attacking Iran and killing its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Mr. Trump would not identify which of the four living predecessors he was referring to.

“He said, ‘I wish I did what you did,’” Mr. Trump said. “I don’t want to get into ‘who,’ I don’t want to get him into trouble.”

All of the four living ex-presidents have denied any such conversation. Is Trump delusional? Insane? Lying by rote as he always does?

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Lunacy, Music, Politics | Comments Off on Is Trump Insane, Delusional, or Merely an Inveterate Liar?