Pushing Back Against Education

  • How nationalist and religious ideologists are against education, example 5,271,009;
  • How Trump has invited Putin to attack American allies;
  • About Biden’s memory, from a neuroscientist;
  • Short items about Nextdoor.com, the Supreme Court, how the Republican problem is metastasizing;
  • How Paul Krugman is now deeply worried for America;
  • And a link to Connie Willis’ latest summary of political developments.

*

NY Times, 10 Feb 2024 (in today’s print paper): ‘It Is Suffocating’: A Top Liberal University Is Under Attack in India, subtitled “A campaign to make the country an explicitly Hindu nation has had a chilling effect on left-leaning and secular institutions like Jawaharlal Nehru University.”

Print title: “Hindu Radicals Target Colleges As ‘Anti-India’.

Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Psychology, Religion | Comments Off on Pushing Back Against Education

The True and the Real

  • About the difference between “true” and “real” and recalling Delany’s DHALGREN;
  • An essay about the reality of mathematics, and whether math implies God.

Years ago there was a novel — it was Samuel R. Delany’s 1975 novel DHALGREN — that has this epigraph:

“You have confused the true and the real.”

The line was attributed to George Stanley, in conversation, which means there’s no looking it up, except as used in this book.

For years I’ve been puzzled by the phrase. Isn’t what’s real true in some sense? Are there things that are true yet not real? Perhaps that’s it.

But just a few days ago I had an insight. The phrase’s meaning depends on the contexts of the two key words, of course, and recent years of increasing mis- and disinformation have brought a context to those words, perhaps not one not intended by Stanley, or Delany. It’s the other way around from what I just suggested.

So here’s my take:

Continue reading

Posted in Mathematics, Philosophy | Comments Off on The True and the Real

Living Proper Lives, and More from the Fringe

  • David Brooks on the value of humanist studies;
  • Shorter pieces on the psychology behind Trump; how evangelicals respond to the rise of the “nones”; measle rates rising in Europe; a David Barton case study; Fox News praising a vigilante who was wrong; and how Mike Johnson is even worse than Kevin McCarthy;
  • But I think I need to shift my focus.

David Brooks, nominally conservative columnist for the NY Times, is a deeper thinker than most conservative columnists, but still spends an odd amount of time worrying about whether people are living their lives in ways he thinks proper. As conservatives do. What is he worrying about this time?

NY Times, David Brooks, 25 Jan 2024: How to Save a Sad, Lonely, Angry and Mean Society

Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Spirituality | Comments Off on Living Proper Lives, and More from the Fringe

From Looking Glass to Scary

My “looking glass” take two days ago was a cute way to avoid discussing the “tribalists” or the “cult” but perhaps things are actually getting too serious to dismiss those items as merely bizarre, upside-down-thinking about the world. If it were only flat earthers, maybe. But even the senior columnists seem to be getting honestly worried about the current state of Republicans and MAGA.

  • Adam Frank on whether our society has become too complex to survive;
  • My thoughts on the pace of change, science fiction, and the MAGA dream of a simplistic past;
  • David Brooks, a right-wing guy, is now shocked by how Republicans have given in to Trumpism;
  • Paul Krugman on whether Americans can survive a party of saboteurs.

Let’s start with this.

Adam Frank, Big Think, 9 Feb 2024: Have we created a society that’s too complex to survive?, subtitled “Human civilization has always survived periods of change. Will our rapidly evolving technological era be an exception to the rule?”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Politics | Comments Off on From Looking Glass to Scary

Items about Science, Math, and Philosophy

There are always looking glass items, as I described topics in yesterday’s post, but for today let’s look at more substantial items.

  • It’s been 100 years since Hubble discovered that our own galaxy wasn’t the entirety of the universe;
  • Steven Strogatz and Terence Tao discuss the idea of “good” mathematics;
  • Review of a book about Spinoza;
  • Arthur C. Brooks’ ideas from Schopenhauer about getting big things done.

Big Think, Marcelo Gleiser, 7 Feb 2024: 100 years after the “Great Debate”: How Edwin Hubble expanded the cosmos, subtitled “In 1924, Edwin Hubble found proof that the Milky Way isn’t the only galaxy in the Universe.”

Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Mathematics, Philosophy, Science | Comments Off on Items about Science, Math, and Philosophy

Another Visit Through the Looking Glass to MAGALand

  • The US is leading the world economically, but not according to MAGALand;
  • MAGAfolks say they venerate the Constitution, yet support Trump as dictator;
  • How prophets assert that Trump is president, and the GOP asserts that Trump did not commit insurrection;
  • How Republicans gambled the Democrats would not compromise, and lost; David Frum on how Republicans won’t take yes for an answer;
  • Thomas L. Friedman: GOP priorities are Trump, then Putin, then America;
  • Robert Reich on how Trump fans/cultists threaten rivals with violence;
  • GOP candidates burning books;
  • How the arguments for Trump staying on ballots is weak;
  • How MAGA cultists are shocked that historical figures were gay.

NY Times, 2 Feb 2024 (published in Monday’s 5 Feb print edition): The Soft Landing Is Global, but It’s Cushiest in America, subtitled, “Economies all over the world are lowering inflation while avoiding serious recession — but growth in the United States stands out.”

Print title: “Economies Worldwide Can’t Match U.S. Growth” subtitled “Factors aiding America’s recovering and holding back that of Europe and Japan.”

While in MAGALand people believe the U.S. economy is in shambles and blame President Biden.

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Lunacy, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on Another Visit Through the Looking Glass to MAGALand

Bertrand Russell, THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY

This is the third of three short books about philosophy that I read in January. It’s as unlike the other two as those two were unlike each other.

(Oxford University Press, 167pp, first published 1912, paperback edition 1959, edition shown 47th printing)

Bertrand Russell, lived a long life, from 1872 to 1970, and so worked mostly in the 20th century. He has always struck me as the first truly modern philosopher, partly because he was not trying to justify any religious background or upbringing, as so many of the earlier philosophers did, and in part because he addressed the entirety of previous philosophy in his enormous book A History of Western Philosophy, published in 1946. He seemed to me as the essence of a rational thinker who didn’t presume to just make stuff up, as so many previous philosophers did. At the same time he speculated on many things that modern science has provided decisive insights into.

Also, he was a public intellectual in the sense that he wrote articles, and books, on numerous political, cultural, and moral issues. I first encountered him with his 1927 book Why I Am Not a Christian, which I first read back in 1979, and revisited its title essay in 2017 in this post.

Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Philosophy, science fiction | Comments Off on Bertrand Russell, THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY

Stalwarts? Traditionalists? Tribalists? Cultists? Some Evidence

First, I’d thought to post a summary review of the third short philosophy book I’ve read recently — Bertrand Russell’s THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY — but as the day turned out, I had time only to do another round-up of articles I’ve linked the past few days (which takes less time than a book review/profile). Will try to do Russell tomorrow. Of course, these links are all about philosophy in a sense…

  • A Catholic representative considers the nonreligious a “social liability”;
  • How Fearless Leader disregards the truth;
  • Short items: A Fox host defends the strong economy; how Trump staged a fake rally;
  • How Fox News wants Taylor Swift to shut up, while welcoming any number of other celebrities who support conservatives;
  • Red states targeting librarians;
  • How the GOP misrepresents the border bill;
  • WaPo on how the Republicans will never get another border security deal this good;
  • Adam Lee on Houston punishing those who feed the homeless;
  • Paul Krugman defends the idea that “immigrants make America stronger and richer”.

Stalwarts? Traditionalists? Tribalists? Cultists? Let’s look at some evidence. From just the past couple days.

Joe.My.God, 3 Feb 2024: Catholic League: The Unreligious Are A “Social Liability”

Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Economics, Philosophy, Politics | Comments Off on Stalwarts? Traditionalists? Tribalists? Cultists? Some Evidence

Stalwarts and Progressives: Notes from the (Fringe)

  • Reconsidering how to characterize what I’ve been calling the “fringe”;
  • Taylor Swift and MAGA;
  • Bobby Azarian on why Trump’s supporters don’t believe evidence;
  • Applying the Jack Smith rule to statements from the National Prayer Breakfast.

Here’s the thing: I shouldn’t be referring to the “fringe” as if the people I’ve described being there are outliers. Their sheer numbers indicate they are not outliers, though they are likely still in the minority. (Trump never won a majority of the vote.) What’s changed in the past decade or two isn’t that the number of ignorant, irresponsible, amoral people has ballooned; it’s that we’re hearing more about them, via social media, and see their exacerbating effect on public consciousness and politics.

Still, there should be a term to differentiate the kind of people who vote for Trump, the kind of people who reject modern science and morality (not necessarily the same of course), the racists and misogynists, the believers in woo, and so on, from the relatively more sophisticated, worldly people, including the philosophers and scientists and engineers who have built our modern world, and the artists including musicians and writers and painters who try to honestly interpret our modern world.

Tribalists versus free-thinkers? Maybe… Or maybe not, since those are accurate yet loaded terms. Be nicer and call them Traditionalists? (Of course that implies that progressives disavow tradition, which is hardly the case.) Whatever the first group might be called, here are several items about them today. As I’ve said, I’m fascinated by them not to rag on Republicans or conservatives, but in genuine curiosity about the limitations of human intelligence, and thus the potential of the human race. (In my standard science fiction perspective.) (I noted a few days ago a distinction on some TV show between “stalwarts” and progressives; that word stalwart has a nice flavor to connote the dedication of conservatives to what they feel are immutable truths. Though it has an unfortunate historical connotation…)

NY Times, David French, 4 Feb 2024: Taylor Swift and the Profound Weirdness of MAGA

Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Lunacy, Religion | Comments Off on Stalwarts and Progressives: Notes from the (Fringe)

Three brief (non-political) items today.

  • On entertaining new ideas;
  • Reality and quantum mechanics;
  • Nature as the great recycler.

Here’s the first post in a new column that sounds interesting.

Washington Post, Daniel Pink, 29 Jan 2024: Opinion | American imagination needs an adrenaline shot. Here’s how I’ll deliver it.

Continue reading

Posted in Cosmology, Science, Thinking | Comments Off on Three brief (non-political) items today.