After being distracted by Texas affairs, politics, Riven, and reading Brian Greene and others, let’s get back to this book and try to finish summarizing it and capturing key points. This and one more post.
Earlier posts about this book: post 1, post 2, post 3, post 4.
– – –
Part IV: Know Thyself
How does human nature influence our public and private lives? Most of what people know is “based on gut feelings, folk theories, and archaic versions of biology.”
–Ch12, In Touch with Reality
This chapter concerns whether or not reality is socially constructed, or whether we accurately perceive reality. Neither is totally correct. Naive realism is refuted by visual illusions (examples). Again: the brain evolved to prioritize survival and reproduction of the species. Relativists, on the other hand, are concerned with how we categorize things, suggesting that everything is a social construct, even the facts of science and history. But categorization, like stereotypes, can be dangerous: not necessarily false in every respect, but with many ways they can go wrong. Beware identity politics. Some condemn even language as constraining thought. [[ To the extent these are equivalent might lead to some sf speculation. ]] But cognitive scientists and linguists reject such ideas for several reasons. Both images and words are inherently ambiguous; these confusions are reflected in contemporary art.
Continue reading →