Search Results for: how the mind works

Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 10

Finally: the last topic chapter, about The Arts, and then the final chapter. Earlier posts about this book: post 1, post 2, post 3, post 4, post 5, post 6, post 7, post 8, post 9. – – – –Ch20, … Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, Human Nature, Psychology, Steven Pinker | Comments Off on Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 10

Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 7

Today: Violence. Are humans inherently violent? Is war inevitable? Or is violence learned behavior? This chapter, of course, anticipates Pinker’s later book, THE BETTER ANGELS OF OUR NATURE, which documents how violence has *declined* throughout human history, though that’s a … Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, MInd, Steven Pinker | Comments Off on Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 7

Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 6

The final section of the book is about various “Hot Button” topics: politics, violence, gender, children, and the arts. These chapters show how the doctrines of the blank slate, the noble savage, and the ghost in the machine have been … Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, MInd, Morality, Steven Pinker | Comments Off on Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 6

Tribal Human Nature Fights Back

Thomas L. Friedman asks Trump and Vance: What is wrong with you people? Republican attacks against Kamala Harris as being childless reveal base tribal motivations for how society ought to be run; And who’s brainwashing whom? Do children ‘belong’ to … Continue reading

Posted in Human Nature, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on Tribal Human Nature Fights Back

Subjective Worlds

First of all, I updated yesterday’s post to include the initial list of falsehoods in Trump’s RNC acceptance speech as compiled by CNN, and read off on TV by its fact-checker in the minutes after the speech ended. For today, … Continue reading

Posted in conservatives, Politics, Psychology, The Gays | Comments Off on Subjective Worlds

The Incoherency of Religious Rationales

It’s generally considered impolite to point out the irrationality and incoherency of religious faith, but sometimes the examples are so blatant, you wonder if they aren’t signs of some mental disorder. Like those cases where brain damage causes one side … Continue reading

Posted in Meaning, Religion | Comments Off on The Incoherency of Religious Rationales

On This July 4th

It’s worth paying attention from time to time what conservatives really want, and more importantly, their rationales. NY Times, Ruth Graham, 4 Jul 2024: Why a New Conservative Brain Trust Is Resettling Across America, subtitled “Pro-Trump professionals aren’t just talking … Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, conservatives, Psychology, Religion, Social Progress | Comments Off on On This July 4th

Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 4

Another five chapters, mostly addressing the fears people have with the idea of an innate human nature, as opposed to the idealized blank slate: concerning inequality, imperfectibility, determinism, and nihilism. Earlier posts about this book: post 1, post 2, post … Continue reading

Posted in Book Notes, MInd, Science, Steven Pinker | Comments Off on Steven Pinker: THE BLANK SLATE, post 4

Loyalty vs. Principles

Three threads today, all related. Considering whistle-blowing as an example of wrestling loyalty vs. principles, and how this applies to Trump and his followers; Related items about how Trump supporters vow to “lie, cheat, and steal”; how Donald Trump knows … Continue reading

Posted in Conservative Resistance, Culture, Evolution, Morality | Comments Off on Loyalty vs. Principles

Politics as Fantasy, as Competing Stories

Three topics for today. The Hunter Biden verdict this morning, and how conservatives explain it to fit their conspiracy theories; Religious dimwittery about installing the Ten Commandments into schools; and Supreme Court Justice Sam Alito’s presumptuous allegiance to Christian godliness … Continue reading

Posted in Morality, Music, Narrative, Politics | Comments Off on Politics as Fantasy, as Competing Stories