Views from Crestmont Drive

Subtitled “The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress”
(Viking, Feb. 2018, xix+556pp, including 102pp of notes, references, and index.)

Here are the first seven of the 17 chapters in the long middle section of the book.  The first one about “Progressophobia,” covers a range of familiar reasons from cognitive psychology why people think the past was better than the present, and the present is a mess.  Topics about life, health, sustenance, etc., are addressed simply by looking at the data (as in the later Rosling book, reviewed here). Then come two topics, inequality and the environment, about which I’m not as sanguine, in 2025, as Pinker was in 2017 when he was writing this book. As even-handed as Pinker tries to be, since he wrote the Trump administrations have steadily tried to make everything worse.

*

Continue reading →

Subtitled “The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress”
(Viking, Feb. 2018, xix+556pp, including 102pp of notes, references, and index.)

The first three chapters of this book are crisp summaries of themes shared with two or three dozen other books I’ve read and posted about here; this book is at the center of a Venn diagram of all of them. Basic ideas of reason and science, of humanism and morality; how the human mind’s ancient legacy is ill-suited for the modern world; the expansion of the circle of empathy for others; the later ideas of evolution, entropy, and information; how life and evolution are possible in zones of order despite long-term entropy; the intuitive and simplistic thinking that derives from our ancient biases, including motivated reasoning; how people would rather think they are right than know what is true; how rules and norms emerged to allow true beliefs to emerge. And then why challenges to Enlightenment values emerged, from the Romantic movement with Rousseau, to religious faith and nationalism, to notions that civilization is in decline or is merely boring compared to the glories of the past.

Continue reading →