Author Archives: Mark R. Kelly

February Reading: Ballard, Le Guin, Swanwick, McDevitt

The high point of the month was the J.G. Ballard autobiography, Miracles of Life (published in the UK by Fourth Estate), a fascinating account of the life of one of the most distinctive and controversial SF writers of the 20th century, about which I can complain only of its brevity. Compared to many autobiographies — the other extreme would be Asimov’s — Ballard’s is brief, almost minimalistic. The first half of the book covers his childhood, already familiar to readers of his semi-autobiographical novel Empire of the Sun, or viewers of the Steven Spielberg film adaptation — he was a child of British parents living in Shanghai (his father worked for a British cotton firm that bowed to Chinese competition in the 1920s), in an isolated, privileged compound existence, until the Japanese invaded in 1937, resulting in their eventual relocation to an internment camp from 1943 until the war’s end in 1945. The difference between real life and film is that the boy Jim was not, in fact, separated from his parents, though in ways JGB explains in the book, it seemed like it. The virtues of the book are the ways Ballard reveals the mindsets of life as he was growing up — the way the British presumed their incarceration was no big deal, not taking the Japanese threat seriously; the way parents of the era, when so many children died of diseases, treated their own children as gambles, not the centers or meanings of their lives.

The second half of the book is a bit scattershot; it does describe events that led to a couple of Ballard’s seminal works, The Atrocity Exhibition (inspired by a certain Whitechapel Gallery art exhibition, the avante garde literary scene of the time, and the premature death of his wife Mary) and Crash (and the response to the David Cronenberg film thereof). More central to this section are his children, which are the titular “miracles of life”, and his second partner Claire Walsh. He spends rather too much space talking about impressive people he’s known — Christopher Evans, Eduardo Paolozzi — though there are interesting anecdotes about serving on a film jury, and finally, his return to Shanghai, in conjunction with a BBC profile about him and The Kindness of Women, in 1991. It was the publication of Miracles of Life that caused Ballard to reveal his diagnosis of prostate cancer, with its terminal implication; but with no worse news thus far, we can only hope there might be some further output from Ballard in the months since he finished this book.

I also read…. the second and third of Ursula K. Le Guin’s young adult novels in her “Western Shore” trilogy, which began with Gifts (2004), and was followed by Voices in 2006 and Powers in 2007. All are beautifully written and inspiring books, and the good news is, if you’re not inclined to commit yourself to reading all three, the books are semi-independent — set in the same world, but concerning different protagonists in different cities. There is a lovely scene at the end of Powers when the three come together in the same place, but it’s a bonus, not a necessary culmination. The virtues of these books are the anthropological imagination Le Guin invests in depicting various cultures, and the way she portrays her characters as presuming the rightness of their own cultures — whether it involves class systems, slavery, or the repression of books — before learning to see the possibilities of other ways of life. Each book portrays, in its fashion, a cultural conceptual breakthrough, the very essence of what, I would say, is the purpose of speculative fiction.

Also: Michael Swanwick’s The Dragons of Babel is a delicious, colorful undermining of the usual tropes of fantasy, while serving as a sly commentary on current politics and war-mongering. Portions of the book were earlier published as separate stories, not all of which I’d previously read, and it’s a tribute to the book that it does not read like a usual fix-up — I couldn’t tell which unread portions I hadn’t read until I researched it.

And on a completely different note, I caught up with Jack McDevitt’s Odyssey, now that it’s on the final Nebula ballot. McDevitt is a bit of a guilty pleasure for me; he’s not especially literary, or cutting-edge in any sense, but he is hard-core science fiction in a way not a lot of good books are these days. McDevitt’s virtue is that he writes what I would call Hard SF Space Opera — he deals with casual FTL space flight and various aliens races out there in the galactic arm — and though his political and social interactions are identical with 20th century life, his SFnal content is knowledgeable in the sense that he understands the distances involved and the astrophysical characteristics of real stars and planets. (If only *any* Hollywood film were so well informed.) Odyssey keys off the idea of UFOs and analogous observations throughout human history, here called “moonriders”, but ultimately it deals more with human politics and gullibility than it does with the questionable existence of actual alien beings. McDevitt’s tolerance for unresolved endings (which McDevitt Locus reviewer Russell Letson has noted) makes his novels rather like episodes in an ongoing, open-ended series, not unlike, say, Lost, or thinking back, certain plot threads of Star Trek: the Next Generation. The book reaches a resolution, but there are mysteries yet to discover.

Interesting Nebula Observation

Locus Online’s version of the final Nebula ballot is now posted (and integrated into the SF Awards index, at least insofar as the Nominee Indexes are concerned), and I couldn’t help but noticing a significant fact: that, despite the rolling 2-year eligibility rule for Nebula nominations, almost all of this year’s final ballot consists of books and stories published last year, 2007, with only a very few leftovers from 2006. I checked, and the proportion of recent to leftover eligibles has never been higher than on this year’s ballot.

Don’t know that that means anything…; certainly the disconnect between nominees and the favorites of the various Locus Recommended Reading List is just as wide. I’m not *quite* as cynical as CNB about the Nebula nominating process (see February’s editorial), but the facts, er, the nominations, speak for themselves.

Awards Index update, for now

I’ve gone ahead and updated the majority of the awards index, leaving aside for now a few foreign language awards and others, but having reviewed steps toward what I hope will be more frequent updates in the future. I know I said that last year but… this time fur sure.

I’ve also tweaked the page widths and font sizes, though probably not that anyone will notice.

2007 Summaries

It occurred to me a week or so ago that I should be able to analyze and summarize all the weekly bestseller rankings that I’ve been compiling for the website, to get some kind of cumulative rankings of overall bestsellers for the entire year. Of course, needless to say, actual total sales of books are not available (except perhaps via the subscription service BookScan, to which I don’t subscribe); I had only rankings on the various bestseller lists to analyze, which of course indicate only *relative* sales, in each week, and might easily be misleading as indications of actual sales, especially since lists from some sources separate by format (hardcover, paperback, mass market paperback, trade paperback) and genre (fiction, nonfiction, children’s), while others don’t… and some sources, like the New York Times, contrive to avoid listing some specific YA titles altogether, e.g. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows; NYT has a ‘series books’ lists for such titles instead.

Anyway–what I found after several iterations of tweaking mapping functions of rankings to scores, to weight rankings on different kinds of lists into some sort of consistent, comparable system, is that subtle adjustments didn’t matter very much. The overall rankings of bestsellers could just as easily be based on total number of mentions on the various bestseller lists, regardless of how each mention ranked overall. At least for the top 10 or so in each category…

The tally of books on ‘best of the year’ lists was easier, and more interesting, partly because some titles get attention from very different audiences. The unstated observation on that page is that certain titles, though popular on those *other* lists, are not included on Locus Magazine’s own recommended reading list. Which titles those are, is left an exercise for the reader.

Meanwhile, online votes in the Locus Poll and Survey are flowing in — over 200 now — and I’ve already done a tabulation of the ballots up to yesterday morning. Certain trends are apparent; it will be interesting to see if they prevail.

Catching Up; HP service

So I actually took a day’s vacation off work today to catch up on some overdue listings pages on the website, including the Classics Reprint page, which hadn’t been updated for a while partly because the pace of new books that fit that category has been sadly slow for several months now.

The past week has been busy anyway, what with formatting the Locus recommended reading list, and setting up the online Locus Poll & Survey ballot — which will go live in a few days, probably, after various parties have finished vetting the drop-down choices in those categories — magazine, publisher, editor, artist — not determined by the recommended reading list itself. We try to include all plausible candidates, but always manage to miss a few, if email response is any indication.

Meanwhile, I’m intending to revive a compilation of *other* best-of-year lists, from newspaper and non-Locus Sf sites, as I did regularly up until a couple three years ago. I’ve already ‘blinked’ a number of these — lists from Amazon, SF Site, Entertainment Weekly, etc. — but now intend to compile them, see which books are mentioned most often. Not to undercut the Locus Rec Reading list, of course; only to supplement it. That should be done in another day or two.

Also meanwhile, I’m happy to report that Hewlett Packard has been very responsive to the hardware problems with my laptop, as I mentioned a few posts ago. I reported the problem via their website, they sent a shipping box (an empty box, delivered via FedEx), I packed up the laptop in the box and left it at a FedEx drop-off site a week ago Saturday. On Wednesday there was a FedEx tag on my front door about a delivery requiring in-person signature. It wasn’t until Saturday again that I managed to take delivery at a FedEx facility over by the Van Nuys airport… They replaced and ‘upgraded’ (though I’m not sure what they meant by that) the entire screen and hinges — and also, alas, reinitialized the hard drive to factory delivery conditions, wiping out the few settings I’d left, having already deleted all my personal data and uninstalling all my software. It’s like having a completely new laptop, except for the visible wear on the keyboard from 10 months of prior use…

Books to Films

I just finished reading Cormac McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men, *after* having seen the film earlier this month, in contrast to my experience with Ian McEwan’s Atonement last month, where I read the book first and then saw the film. My experiences could have been interchanged, however, with similar reactions — that I can’t remember seeing films so faithfully adapted from their literary sources. No Country, the book, reads — especially given McCarthy’s spare, stripped down prose — almost like a transcript of the film, except that of course some of the scenes *are* longer in the book, and there are more passages of philosophical monologues by the sheriff, Bell (Tommy Lee Jones in the film). The book ends even more elegaically than the film; it does work better, easing toward a contemplative conclusion that’s not quite so abrupt as the film’s ending, which apparently has been widely debated. (Of course, in the defenses of the film’s ending I’ve seen, no one mentions that it’s because the book ended that way. It’s not a reason, of course.)

I also spent two weeks reading Dan Simmons’ The Terror, not just because it’s long–nearly 800 pages–but because during the first of those weeks I had precious little time to read, for multitasking priority reasons. In any case, it’s an amazing books in many ways: gruelling, in its depiction of what mid-19th century explorers went through in their quest to find the Northwest Passage (living aboard a ship stuck in the ice for *three years*, for instance, under dark skies with ice cracking all around, hoping that maybe *next* summer the ice would melt and they could continue their voyage…), but impressive and overwhelming; the length of the book serves to impress you with the explorers’ trials in a way no shorter book would. It’s also fascinating in that you’re not entirely sure what kind of book it is until very nearly the end, i.e., to what extent the fantastic premise — focused on a some sort of monster attacking the ships’ survivors — is truly supernatural or not. [Note added later: not unlike, it occurs to me this week, Lost.] By the end, it all wraps up suitably, and though I can’t help but feel it would have been just as strong a novel as a straight historical adventure, Simmons does justice to his fantasy presumptions by drawing on the setting and culture of that time and place, to create an extraordinary feat of historical interpolation about the fate of the infamous expedition. It’s long, but it reads fast, and it’s worth the trip. And it would make a terrific film.

Winter Storms

In between rainstorms this past weekend here in Southern California was one of those magical, chamber of commerce photo-op moments when the mountains to the northeast were capped with snow and the sky was blue and the sun was warm. I snapped a few pix and cut one down to size to replace, at least for the moment, the purple twilight view from here on Medina Road.

More about recent books read shortly.

2007 Reading

I read 87 books in 2007 — all the way through, I mean, not counting the dozens of others that crossed my desk that I skimmed or browsed to some extent to write up their descriptions for the website. That’s actually the most books I’ve read in a single year in the past… 20 years. For over a decade, I had the excuse of reading more short fiction (for my review column in Locus Magazine) than books, and since I gave up the column, various personal and day-job associated circumstances have constrained my reading time, but finally, this past year, I’ve managed to multitask in ways I would not care to further detail in order to get through almost as many books as I’d like to read in a year, and which in my editorial position I feel I *should* get through… at last. And I’m fairly optimistic about keeping it up.

Somewhat like the photographs of the prominent books of each year that used to grace the covers of February issues of Locus Magazine, I’ve stacked up (– *footnote* –) all the books I’ve read in the past year, all 87 of them, and posted a photo of them over in the middle-right pane of this blog. Click for expanded view. Below that, I’ve trimmed away some of the individual cover images of books I read earlier than 3 or 4 months ago.

For a couple years now I’ve meant to write a post about how I’ve variably kept lists and statistics of books and other material I’ve read (inspired by Andrew Wheeler’s book-a-day ambitions, and periodic annual goals of SF Signal’s John DeNardo), and I have forgotten about it. I’ll get to it eventually, maybe soon.

*footnote: It’s raining here in SoCal, and as I was typing this into the Blogger posting window, the power went out. I restarted the PC, relaunched Mozilla Firefox, my current preferred browser, and when it offered to restore my session, I accepted — and the text of this post that I’d typed reappeared! A Blogger ‘saves drafts automatically’ feature, apparently. Cool.

New PC Glitches and Fixes

Per C.E. Petit’s comment to the previous post, I’ve fixed my network adapter (aka wireless receiver) problem; he suggested simply unplugging the device, then plugging it back in. That worked. I’ve also found two other solutions: in the network settings dialogue, disable the wireless connection, then re-enable it; this has the same effect as unplugging and plugging back in. Best, I’ve simply reset the PC’s power settings so that the thing never goes into hibernation. The default had been 20 minutes. I can shut it down when I go to work each day if I want to, but while I’m home, I’d just as soon not have it keep conking out on me.

This morning I had another problem: I woke the machine up, clicked update in Outlook, and got a Windows error message to the effect that “symantic system network inoperable” or somesuch (I didn’t write it down), with the effect being that Outlook would not download any email. I waited half the day, rebooting several times to no better effect, then phoned HP. Turned out HP no longer provides phone technical service for new PCs, so I went online and launched a technical service chat. Eventual result: some problem with the pre-installed Norton Virus utility. Turning off ingoing and outgoing email scanning solved the immediate problem — Outlook downloaded pending emails from the server — and even though Norton reactivated the scanning after 15 minutes, Outlook has been working ever since. HP did follow up with instructions for re-installing Norton, and suggested as a last resort contact Norton themselves to diagnose the problem with their utility. If Outlook hangs from this problem again, I’ll do one or both of those.

Promise to get back to real Locus Online related content soon. Should have a review from Howard & Lawrence of CLOVERFIELD by tomorrow night, or Monday morning at latest.

PC Transitioned..ing

All files including Outlook folders copied onto new machine, and up and running here now, on this big new widescreen monitor.

To previous commentator, I did have some Vista problems when I bought the now-broken laptop last March. One old program, Paint Shop Pro v4, seemed to install, but could not be found in file manager or the programs menu. Worse, programs seemed to simply stop working after I’d launched many windows, or opened and closed many files (e.g. graphics files inside PSP), but this problem went away after a couple months, as if the automatically downloaded Windows updates took care of this problem. I haven’t had any Vista issues in some time, though I’m not using any fancy software–only MS Office and very basic graphics programs and browsers.

OTOH, I must have figured this out last time, but this evening am frustrated trying to find the settings in Vista to 1) show file extensions in Windows Explorer (or whatever it’s called now), and 2) change my mouse setting so hover selects and one click runs, which I’ve become used to on all my XP machines…

Hardware aside, today I’ve set up 2008 archive pages on the website, and 2008 directory pages. Awards index updates still proceeding in the background…

–Oh, I am having one odd hardware problem with the new PC, or rather the new ‘network adapter’ (wifi antenna) that I bought the other day. It works just fine with the new PC is first booted, but after the PC hibernates and is re-awakened, it fails to detect the wireless network; at best it advises that the network signal is very weak, or perhaps there is some interference from another network. But then rebooting the PC seems to reset the adapter, and it picks up and connects the wifi network just fine. Hmm.