Author Archives: Mark R. Kelly

I spent the afternoon catching up on New Book listings, including listings of several audiobooks that have been sent to me over the past couple months by Audio Renaissance (who are owned by Holtzbrinck Publishers LLC, who also own Tor Books). They’re pricey items and need to be acknowledged, though personally I’ve never gotten the hang of audiobooks. I’ve tried a couple times, while driving, but wasn’t able to maintain the constant attention required to track the narrative; it’s not like you can look up from the page of the book for a moment, and then back down to the point you left off. Locus, both magazine and online, tried audiobook reviews for a while, from John Joseph Adams, but that didn’t work out. Still, despite the prices ($49.95 and up), there must be an audience for them…

I’m off on a business trip this next week — my first business trip of any sort in about five years, given recent corporate belt-tightening. It’s a 3-day training course in Alexandria VA, just outside Washington DC, from Monday through Wednesday, and so I’m flying out of LA tomorrow, and since I was encouraged to travel on my own time, will be returning Wednesday night.

After that I’ll be home a week before flying out for World Fantasy Con, on Thursday the 3rd, arriving mid-afternoon at O’Hare and then driving to Madison; returning by reverse means on Monday.

I finished reading a short book by David Berlinski the other day, A Short History of Mathematics, which I’d picked up on impulse a couple weeks ago at the bookstore (a rare occurence of my actually *buying* something in a bookstore, rather than browsing, going home, and ordering from Amazon). I was a math major way back when and still find all that abstruse material fascinating, especially now that such material doesn’t come up very often in the course of my mundane (or fantastic) life.

Berlinski is quite a character, it turns out, especially so for someone best-known for writing mathematical tomes (earlier, A Tour of the Calculus and The Advent of the Algorithm). You can tell first by his haphazardly ornate prose style, in which straightforward accounts of people or concepts are swirled together with extravagant rhetoric and gratuitous, occasionally cranky metaphors. A review on Amazon quotes one line: “Gauss was able to turn down his tablet at once, the correct answer inscribed on slate, even as the dutiful donkeys in the room, chubby farm children of no intellectual distinction, scratched away industriously.” And here’s another from page 174:

An effective calculation is any calculation that could be undertaken, Turing argued, by an exceptionally simple imaginary machine, or even a human computer, someone who has, like a clerk in the department of motor vehicles or a college dean, been stripped of all cognitive powers and can as a result execute only a few primitive acts.

And two pages later: “The algorithm is the second of two great ideas in Western science; the first is the calculus. I have said this before, but I am so pleased with the thought that I am eager to say it again.”

Googling and Amazoning Berlinksi turned up very mixed reactions to his writing, as well as arrogant poses from the author (along the lines of, “that’s how I write, deal with it”), and most bemusingly, proudly displayed credentials from none other than the Discovery Institute, one of the forces promoting Intelligent Design. His Wikipedia entry links to a lengthy 1997 Firing Line TV debate about evolution and creation in which he worries over gaps and pesters an opponent about how many (50,000? 100,000?) morphological changes are required to take one kind of animal to another. His points come across as silly and cantankerous; a lesson about how experts in one field can’t necessarily be trusted in others.

So that’s what I learned about David Berlinski, and pass on to the six of you who read this blog. I think next time I want to refresh myself reading about math, I’ll pick up one of those Rudy Ruckers I’ve never gotten to.

Extreme weather, LA style, means thunder and lightning throughout the night! And bursts of heavy rain during the day that bring office meetings to a pause while everyone wonders if the roof is about to cave in! And this, our second thunderstorm of the year; SoCal has already exceeded its quota. The theme is on my mind as I’m, still, part-way through Kim Stanley Robinson’s latest…

On Locus matters, the conventions list has been updated. Marianne Jablon, former Locus editor and wife of Jonathan Strahan way down in Perth Australia, keeps her hand in by compiling convention listings, which are printed in the magazine as space permits but are always updated the site, every month or two.

The long-awaited Rich Horton essay on which editors have been most successful publishing stories that have won Hugos and Nebulas is up as the next ‘feature’ on the website. It’s required more than usual fact-checking on my part to be certain subtotals and year-references are accurate. The essay should be up sometime this week.

Two reports today of possible glitches with the site, for which I’d appreciate any further feedback….

First, can you reach the site via ‘http://locusmag.com’ rather than ‘http://www.locusmag.com’?

Second, does the site load completely in Firefox?

I’ve tried both of these on my home machine and they seem fine, but others have reported problems. As a general rule, I’ve always kept the coding of the site relatively simple, to avoid any such problems, since I don’t have the resources of a fully professional site to check every design change in all possible browsers… I only just recently added javascript features… and so I depend on feedback from readers to alert me of such issues.

UPDATE Sunday evening — thanks to the half dozen of you who responded and said you’ve seen no problems at all. I’ll consider the matter closed, though of course anyone detecting any problem should of course let me know…

There’s always something more to do. This week, I implemented, after a couple years of intending to do so, links from the Monitor pages back to the Directory pages, for each title listed. The Directory pages accumulate additional links for reviews, awards nominations and wins, etc. indefinitely, while the Monitor pages, once they’re posted, are never updated. The M to D links are a way of knitting the site together more thoroughly.

Then there’s News… about two years ago I switched to a blog-like structure for the homepage, whereby most news items were posted only as items there, on the homepage. I keep meaning to return to posting news items as independent pages — mainly because, as my experience with Google has shown, search engines don’t record changes only to the homepage, but they will pick up new pages. It makes a big difference in the big scheme of things whether your site gets picked up or not, as a source for news items. This evening I posted the Clarion news on a separate page, manually; my intention is to automate this process somehow. More to do.

I spent an hour this evening putting together the 2005 Cover Art Gallery of book and magazine cover images. Unlike the earlier 2004 gallery, the ’05 page includes magazine covers, which entailed a bit of time to extract and blend records from two different databases.

Also, on the ’05 list, I omitted reprint books, which are mostly paperback reprints of last year’s hardcovers, because they generally use the same cover art. Since the purpose of the list is to gather artworks that would make their creators eligible for the Best Artist categories of the Hugo Awards (or the Locus Poll), it seems reasonable to omit ‘reprint’ art.

I did however include cover art from ‘classic reprints’ as compiled on Locus Online, since those are generally new editions with new artwork.

I have yet to gather covers for books I haven’t personally seen (based on listings elsewhere), including art books whose subjects have often made it onto Hugo ballots even when they haven’t done many covers. Also still to do, I’ll probably reformat the page to arrange covers in rows with smaller type beneath each one, rather than the present lengthy vertical list. And there are some other filters I might impose; at the moment nothing filters out ‘classic’ art used on book and magazine covers.

It will be interesting to see if this list has any noticeable influence on next year’s Hugo nominees for best artist….

The refurbished homepage went up Friday evening, and I’ve gotten a couple three nice comments about it. It’s not SciFi.com slick, but then I don’t have their budget. Maybe I’ll invest in something more dramatic for Locus Online’s 10th anniversary, which is only a year and a half from now (!).

I googled ‘locus online’ this afternoon to see if Google had cached the revised homepage, and of course it had; I also noticed via those results that Wikipedia now has an entry for Locus Online. (There’s been one for Locus Magazine for some time.) Who put it there? I have no idea. I look at Wikipedia once in a while but have never tried editing an entry myself, and remain slightly amazed that their ‘anyone can edit’ policy works, since invariably the entries I look at seem remarkably well written — concise and thorough. How can that be if ‘anyone’ can edit? If there’s a ‘flaw’ I can detect in Wikipedia, it’s the inordinate coverage given to aspect of pop culture… e.g. the many many pages about the various Myst games…

Saw Corpse Bride last night, partly due to fortuitous timing (nothing else interesting was playing for another hour) and partly because I assured my partner it was a romantic comedy. Fortunately, I was right. I enjoyed it thoroughly, though as with some previously animated features, I would just as soon have notched the speed control down by 5 or 10%. Why the rush? Perhaps, if Steven (Everything Bad Is Good For You) Johnson is right, it’s a deliberate, if unconscious, decision meant to encourage viewers to buy the eventual DVD that will permit repeated viewings…

Today’s Google alert turned up this press release…

No longer do you need a physics degree or a slide rule to enjoy science fiction! Adventure fans from young adults to seasoned citizens can now jump into the genre without intimidation, because with the release of “Resurrection of Liberty,” science fiction is now accessible to all.

It goes on.

On a more serious note, my favorite commentary on the intelligent design debate is Dahlia Litchwick’s Mind the Gaps from Slate.

ID says we shouldn’t bother ourselves with resolving scientific inconsistencies or untangling puzzles. We should recognize that what God really wants is for us just to stop learning. … What if we just recognized, for instance, that we can’t make the Standard Model of particle physics work? This theory, which purports to describe all known matter — including subatomic particles, such as quarks and leptons, as well as the forces by which they interact — is plagued by scientists’ failure to observe something called “proton decay.” Now, if we apply the ID principle to particle physics, no one ever needs to put on a lab coat again. Quarks and leptons? They’re made of God.

Still tinkering with the design mod, spending lots of time looking at other sites for cues. It’s remarkable how few site designs use curves at all; I feel a bit retro clinging to my rounded corners. But I will for now.

UPDATE 7:30 p.m.: I’ve posted the design mod. Look at it for a couple minutes, then back at the old design.

OK, I’ve suppressed comments.

Only one comment (via e-mail) so far to the current re-design study of the homepage. I’m happy with the layout and colors except for the new headlines boxes, which I’m still tweaking, especially the colors.

I see today that Salon has converted to a blog-type format, posting time-stamped items in reverse chronological order. Makes sense…

Lost is getting more interesting, with revelations about the purpose of the bunker underneath the hatch, though I think the writers are making too much of this ‘science’ vs. ‘faith’ debate; under the circumstances, it was clearly *prudent* of the survivors to enter the code one more time (i.e. there was nothing to be, er, lost by doing so), whether or not anyone had ‘faith’ that it was necessary…. Not quite blinkable, this item about how last night’s show has given a boost sales of Flann O’Brien’s The Third Policeman.

Finally, I’ve made the commitment and bought an airline ticket in order to attend the World Fantasy Convention in Madison WI, the first weekend of November. If anyone who’ll be there is reading this, I’ll arrive Thursday night and leave Monday morning.

First, I’ve changed the comment option for this blog to allow ‘only registered users’, which I hope will eliminate the dozen or so comment spam I’ve been getting every day for the past few days. If not, I’ll just prohibit comments altogether; it’s not as if I get all that many. Which is not to say that comments aren’t appreciated; they certainly are, and if I’m reduced to allowing them only by email, I’ll just manually paste any into the blog that are of general interest or needful of reply.

Second, I’m toying as ever with design refinements to the homepage of Locus Online. The latest study is here. There are three things going on here.

1) I’ve replaced the biege color of the left sidebar and date bars with a soft bluish green. I’ve never been really fond of that biege color, but it’s hard finding soft colors (that don’t distract from the overall page layout defined by the curvy rocketship line) that don’t look like easter egg colors. I found the biege — it’s f7efde — on another site, years ago. Looking at the new page on my laptop, on which colors aren’t as intense as on a PC screen, even a flatscreen, the bluish green is perhaps not distinct enough from the purplish blue of the Locus Magazine right sidebar…

2) I’ve widened the page by another 50 pixels, to 800 pixels. (For the moment, some of the graphics have been stretched, rather than rebuilt.)

3) Most obviously, I’ve set up a ‘highlights’ or ‘headlines’ set of boxes at the top of the center pane, as a place to preserve links to the most worthy content of the past few weeks or months, to overcome the drawback of the strictly bloglike chronological format of the past 2 years, whereby such content scrolls down like everything else and might be missed by occasional viewers. Here again I’m not sure I’m happy with the colors; it needs to stand out, but perhaps the block of darker color is too much like a sore thumb.

Comments, opinions, feedback, are welcome, as always. (Via email if necessary.) I get so few, those I do get tend to be disproportionately influential…

PS Cynthia Ward’s Battlestar Galactica review arrived today. Balancing the desire to ‘space out’ such reviews, with the currency of the review given the recent release of the DVD, and my own schedule… well, look for it by the end of the week.

UPDATE — I’ve tweaked some colors on the posted file, so some of the comments above are no longer quite pertinent.